Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 21;7:15922. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16218-3

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Transmural Dispersion. Absolute ∆APD80 was calculated in milliseconds from epi, mid, and endo areas of the transmural surface. (a) No significant difference was observed from ∆APD80 across the transmural surface post IKs blockade in protocol B. (b) ∆APD80 was calculated as the difference between post and pre-treatment. APD80 reduction from isoprenaline was significantly greater in the epicardium as compared to the endocardium. On the other hand, APD80 under IKr blockade increased more significantly in the midmyocardium and endocardium as compared to the epicardium. (c) Normalized ∆APD80 was calculated as the difference between post treatment and baseline. The transmural gradient was increased by both isoprenaline and E-4031, a trend which was also observed in comparing pre- and post-treatments.