Table 2.
Comparison between monohydroxy derivative (MHD) steady‐state trough concentrations obtained in therapeutic drug monitoring by Li et al. 29 and predicted by different models
Model | MPE | RMSE |
---|---|---|
Parent‐metabolite model with back‐transformation and estimated allometric coefficients | 27.7% | 7.2 |
Parent‐metabolite model with back‐transformation and fixed allometric coefficients | 39% | 7.8 |
MHD model developed by Peng et al. 22 | 44.1% | 14.5 |
MHD model developed by Sallas et al. 15 | 95.6% | 14.2 |
MHD model developed by Sugiyama et al. 16 | 69.1% | 11.4 |
MHD model developed by Wang et al. 17 | 145.1% | 24.5 |