Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;83(12):2695–2708. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13392

Table 2.

Comparison between monohydroxy derivative (MHD) steady‐state trough concentrations obtained in therapeutic drug monitoring by Li et al. 29 and predicted by different models

Model MPE RMSE
Parent‐metabolite model with back‐transformation and estimated allometric coefficients 27.7% 7.2
Parent‐metabolite model with back‐transformation and fixed allometric coefficients 39% 7.8
MHD model developed by Peng et al. 22 44.1% 14.5
MHD model developed by Sallas et al. 15 95.6% 14.2
MHD model developed by Sugiyama et al. 16 69.1% 11.4
MHD model developed by Wang et al. 17 145.1% 24.5