Table 2.
Pearson correlation coefficients between different parameters of the Corvis ST measurement and the proposed Young's modulus.
| IOP | A1L | A1V | A2L | A2V | Radius | DA | CCT | A1T | A2T | PD | E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IOP | 1 | |||||||||||
| A1L | .219∗∗ | 1 | ||||||||||
| A1V | −.590 ∗∗ | −.072 | 1 | |||||||||
| A2L | .190∗∗ | .229∗∗ | −.169∗∗ | 1 | ||||||||
| A2V | .612 ∗∗ | .153∗∗ | −.493∗∗ | .269∗∗ | 1 | |||||||
| Radius | .297∗∗ | .198∗∗ | −.239∗∗ | .194∗∗ | .366∗∗ | 1 | ||||||
| DA | −.778 ∗∗ | −.162∗∗ | .597 ∗∗ | −.200∗∗ | −.692 ∗∗ | −.402∗∗ | 1 | |||||
| CCT | .366∗∗ | .315∗∗ | −.262∗∗ | .280∗∗ | .425∗∗ | .353∗∗ | −.318∗∗ | 1 | ||||
| A1T | .986 ∗∗ | .216∗∗ | −.600 ∗∗ | .197∗∗ | .617 ∗∗ | .299∗∗ | −.775 ∗∗ | .371∗∗ | 1 | |||
| A2T | −.794 ∗∗ | −.190∗∗ | .604 ∗∗ | −.097∗ | −.551 ∗∗ | −.295∗∗ | .735 ∗∗ | −.307∗∗ | −.808 ∗∗ | 1 | ||
| PD | −.737 ∗∗ | −.098∗ | .487∗∗ | −.164∗∗ | −.677 ∗∗ | −.212∗∗ | .750 ∗∗ | −.299∗∗ | −.732 ∗∗ | .630 ∗∗ | 1 | |
| E | .102∗ | −.042 | −.181∗∗ | −.070 | .054 | −.250∗∗ | −.097∗ | −.165∗∗ | .108∗ | −.087∗ | −.201∗∗ | 1 |
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); ∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). A1T and A2T: applanation times; A1L and A2L: applanation diameters; A1V and A2V: applanation velocities; PD peak distance; DA: maximum deformation amplitude; CCT: central corneal thickness; E: Young's modulus.