Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 18;7(11):e00857. doi: 10.1002/brb3.857

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Call Type Composition per Genotype, Sex, and Day. (a) Call types for PD 8 WT mice. (b) Call types for PD 8 KO mice. (a,b) PD 8 KO animals emitted more frequency steps and upward calls, but fewer complex, two syllable, chevron, and composite calls when compared with WT mice. (c) Call types for PD 11 WT mice. (d) Call types for PD 11 KO mice. (c,d) PD 11 KO animals emitted more frequency steps and upward calls, but less complex and two syllable calls when compared with WT mice. (e) Call types for PD 8 males. (f) Call types for PD 8 females. (e,f) PD 8 males emitted more two syllable cries, but less frequency steps calls when compared with females. (g) Call types for PD 11 males. (h) Call types for PD 11 females. (g,h) PD 11 males emitted more two syllable, short, and downward call types, but fewer chevron and frequency steps calls when compared with females. * = p < .05; ** = p < .01; *** = p < .001