Table 2.
Response | Nivolumab alone (N=316) |
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (N=314) |
Ipilimumab alone (N=315) |
---|---|---|---|
Best overall response — no. (%)† | |||
Complete response | 28 (8.9) | 36 (11.5) | 7 (2.2) |
Partial response | 110 (34.8) | 145 (46.2) | 53 (16.8) |
Stable disease | 34 (10.8) | 41 (13.1) | 69 (21.9) |
Progressive disease | 119 (37.7) | 71 (22.6) | 154 (48.9) |
Could not be determined | 25 (7.9) | 21 (6.7) | 32 (10.2) |
Objective response‡ | |||
No. of patients (% [95% CI]) | 138 (43.7 [38.1–49.3]) | 181 (57.6 [52.0–63.2]) | 60 (19.0 [14.9–23.8]) |
Estimated odds ratio (95% CI)§ | 3.40 (2.02–5.72) | 6.11 (3.59–10.38) | — |
Two-sided P value | <0.00001 | <0.00001 | — |
Time to objective response — mo | |||
No. of responders | 138 | 181 | 60 |
Median | 2.78 | 2.76 | 2.79 |
Range | 2.3–12.5 | 1.1–11.6 | 2.5–12.4 |
Best overall response was assessed by the investigator with the use of RECIST v1.1.
Data include patients with a complete response and those with a partial response. The calculation of the confidence interval was based on the Clopper–Pearson method. These analyses were conducted using a two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by PD-L1 status, BRAF mutation status, and metastasis stage.
Relative to ipilimumab alone.