Table 5.

Summary of significant hierarchical multiple regression models predicting self-objectification, shape concern, and weight concern

	B	SE B	β	t	R 2	F
Predicting T2 self-objectification
T1 self-objectification	0.61	0.06	0.65	9.48**
T1 MUQ Unease	−0.26	0.12	−0.19	−2.25*
T2 MUQ Unease	0.48	0.11	0.34	4.28**
Thin-ideal internalization	−0.26	0.43	−0.04	−0.61
Body dissatisfaction	−0.03	0.02	−0.10	−1.68	0.56	37.83**
Predicting T2 shape concern
Model 1
T1 Shape Concern	0.47	0.08	0.46	6.18**
T1 SCQ Body Discomfort	0.0004	0.03	0.001	0.01
T2 SCQ Body Discomfort	0.13	0.03	0.33	4.19**
Thin-ideal internalization	0.06	0.08	0.04	0.68
Body dissatisfaction	−0.01	0.004	−0.10	−1.45	0.57	38.71**
Model 2
T1 Shape Concern	0.60	0.08	0.58	7.87**
T1 SCQ Pressure	−0.03	0.03	−0.08	−1.12
T2 SCQ Pressure	0.08	0.03	0.19	2.83**
Thin-ideal internalization	0.07	0.09	0.05	0.80
Body dissatisfaction	−0.01	0.005	−0.15	−2.10*	0.51	31.50**
Predicting T2 weight concern
Model 1
T1 Weight Concern	0.47	0.07	0.46	6.73**
T1 SCQ Body Discomfort	0.01	0.03	0.03	0.34
T2 SCQ Body Discomfort	0.11	0.03	0.28	3.70**
Thin-ideal internalization	0.07	0.08	0.05	0.85
Body dissatisfaction	−0.01	0.004	−0.17	−2.59*	0.60	44.03**
Model 2
T1 Weight Concern	0.57	0.07	0.57	8.20**
T1 SCQ Pressure	−0.03	0.03	−0.08	−1.10
T2 SCQ Pressure	0.06	0.03	0.14	2.22*
Thin-ideal internalization	0.09	0.09	0.07	1.06
Body dissatisfaction	−0.01	0.004	−0.23	−3.44**	0.55	36.25**

N = 157. Thin-ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction were measured at T1. B = unstandardized partial regression coefficient. SE B = standard error of the unstandardized estimate. β = standardized beta weight. Values for R² are adjusted. Scale scores not presented here were not significant predictors of any of these three outcomes (ps > .08). Models were highly similarly when also controlling for BMI. *p < .05. **p < .01