Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 17;8:678. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00678

Table 4.

Adjusted means* of change from baseline and treatment comparisons of all variables (ITT Population).

Variable Visit MMN/EBM-fortified (N = 146) Control (N = 144) Comparison: MMN/EBM-fortified vs. control beverage
N Mean (SE) N Mean (SE) Difference 95% CI P value
SWM Day 60 146 −0.63 (0.55) 144 −0.65 (0.55) 0.02 (−1.51, 1.56) 0.976
“Between Error” Day 121 142 −0.78 (0.60) 141 −0.87 (0.60) 0.1 (−1.57, 1.77) 0.907
SWM Day 60 146 −0.26 (0.18) 144 0.29 (0.18) −0.55 (−1.04, −0.06) 0.029
“Strategy” Day 121 142 −0.26 (0.19) 141 0.04 (0.19) −0.30 (−0.82, 0.22) 0.250
RVIP Day 60 145 −0.00 (0.00) 144 −0.00 (0.00) −0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) 0.887
“Prime” Day 121 141 −0.01 (0.00) 141 0.00 (0.00) −0.01 (−0.02, 0.00) 0.141
RVIP Day 60 145 −14.71 (7.14) 144 −26.09 (7.14) 11.38 (−8.49, 31.25) 0.261
“Median latency” Day 121 141 −21.79 (8.02) 141 −35.35 (8.00) 13.57 (−8.72, 35.86) 0.232
RVIP Day 60 145 1.43 (1.05) 144 1.91 (1.05) −0.48 (−3.41, 2.45) 0.748
“False alarm” Day 121 141 2.28 (1.37) 141 2.74 (1.36) −0.45 (−4.25, 3.34) 0.814
Paired Associates Learning Day 60 146 0.59 (0.86) 144 1.38 (0.87) −0.79 (−3.19, 1.61) 0.516
Day 121 142 0.62 (0.78) 141 0.93 (0.78) −0.32 (−2.49, 1.86) 0.773
Stockings of Cambridge Day 60 145 0.33 (0.15) 140 0.35 (0.15) −0.02 (−0.43, 0.39) 0.908
Day 121 141 0.23 (0.15) 136 0.34 (0.15) −0.11 (0.52, 0.31) 0.613
RCPM Day 60 146 1.29 (0.39) 144 1.41 (0.39) −0.13 (−1.21, 0.96) 0.819
Day 121 142 1.60 (0.43) 141 1.84 (0.43) −0.24 (−1.45, 0.97) 0.700
*

From ANCOVA model with treatment, age strata, and treatment age interaction as factors and baseline as covariate.

ANCOVA, Analysis of Covariance; CI, confidence interval; EBM, Bacopa monnieri extract; ITT, intent-to-treat; MMN, multiple micronutrients; RCPM, Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices; RVIP, Rapid Visual Information Processing; SE, standard error; SWM, Spatial Working Memory.