Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 17;8:678. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00678

Table 5.

Adjusted means* of change from baseline and treatment comparisons for Rapid Visual Information Processing (“Prime” and “False Alarm”) scores according to age stratum at Day 21 (ITT Population).

Variable Age stratum MMN/EBM-fortified Control Comparison: MMN/EBM-fortified vs. control beverage
N Mean (SE) N Mean (SE) Difference 95% CI P value
RVIP “Prime” ≥7 and < 9 years 42 −0.01 (0.01) 44 0.01 (0.01) −0.02 (−0.04, −0.00) 0.024
≥9 and < 11 years 70 0.00 (0.01) 68 −0.01 (0.01) 0.01 (−0.01, 0.02) 0.217
≥11 and ≤ 12 years 31 −0.01 (0.01) 29 0.00 (0.00) −0.01 (−0.02, 0.00) 0.141
RVIP “False alarm” ≥7 and < 9 years 42 0.94 (2.37) 44 6.84 (2.30) −5.91 (−12.37, 0.56) 0.073
≥9 and < 11 years 70 0.07 (1.82) 68 1.41 (1.85) −1.34 (−6.45, 3.77) 0.606
≥11 and ≤ 12 years 29 5.84 (2.84) 29 −0.04 (2.85) 5.89 (−1.98, 13.75) 0.142
*

From ANCOVA model with treatment, age strata, and treatment age interaction as factors and baseline as covariate.

CI, confidence interval; EBM, Bacopa monnieri extract; ITT, intent-to-treat; MMN, multiple micronutrients; RVIP, Rapid Visual Information Processing; SE, standard error.