Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0188532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188532

Fig 4. Performance comparison when the algorithm and all of the physicians got a vote in the consensus opinion.

Fig 4

Comparison of the algorithm and individual physicians at predicting the consensus triage and exacerbation (y/n) in the validation set: (a) triage identification, (b) exacerbation identification. A comparison of the algorithm with the average physician in accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, ppv, and npv for: (c) triage identification, (d) exacerbation identification. Triage statistics were computed as defined in Eqs 17.