Skip to main content
. 2017 Jul 27;34(11):1515–1522. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1001-8

Table 1.

Estimates of probability-related parameters used to determine the cost-effectiveness of PGS for women older than 37 using IVF

Parameter Base-case estimate Minimum value Maximum value Sources
Probability that a cycle has at least one euploid blastocyst (PGS arm) 64.0% 36.4% 82.0% [7, 11, 13]
Probability that a blastocyst called euploid by PGS is transferred 100.0% Authors’ Assumption
Probability that a blastocyst called aneuploid by PGS is transferred 0.0% Authors’ Assumption
Probability of live birth in a pregnancy that results from euploid blastocysts and is not miscarried 99.8% 99.0% 100% [7, 13]
Probability that at least one blastocyst meets traditional morphological criteria for transfer (non-PGS arm) 66.0% 49.5% 94.5% [7, 14]
Probability that only one blastocyst is transferred in a transferred cycle (non-PGS arm) 11.4% 8.6% 14.3% [7, 13]
Probability that a blastocyst selected for transfer by traditional morphological criteria is aneuploid (non-PGS arm) 30.6% 19.0% 55.2% [12, 15]
Adjusted odds ratio of clinical pregnancy in a PGS guided cycle relative to a non-PGS guided cycle 1.18 1.05 3.86 [7, 13]
Probability of clinical pregnancy in a non-PGS guided cycle 42.5% 31.9% 49.5% [7, 13]
Adjusted odds ratio of miscarriage (per pregnancy) in a PGS guided cycle relative to a non-PGS guided cycle 0.55 0.32 0.70 [7, 13]
Probability of miscarriage in a pregnancy resulting from a non-PGS guided cycle 26.0% 19.6% 39.0% [7, 13, 14, 16]
Probability of live birth in a pregnancy that results from a non-PGS guided cycle and is not miscarried 97.8% 97.3% 99.0% [7]