Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 2;34(11):1469–1474. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1022-3

Table 1.

Data of ovarian tissue cryopreservation: Result of questionnaire to the facilities in Japan belonged in Society for Fertility Preservation (JSFP) on April 30, 2016

Facility Number of practice Cryopreservation method Since Age Cancer cell examination Number of transplantations Days of hospitalization Fee (€)
Excision of tumor Cryopreservation Renewal Transplantation
A 66 V 2010/10 14–41 HD 1 4 5000 0 420 5000
B 18 V 2013/1 9–36 HD 0 5 1300 800 (incl. IVM: 1250) Undecided
C 16 V 2014/6 14–41 HD 0 3 4200 0
D 14 SF 2008/9 14–45 HD 0 4–5 5000 (all)
E 9 V 2012/12 13–35 HD 1 others 7 0 5–7 3300 0 2500
F 6 SF 2006/9 15–28 HD 0 5 5000 100
G 5 Cell sleeper 2008/5 12–18 None 0 3–4 2500 500
H 5 NA 2014/2 18–36 HD 0 3 5500
I 1 V/SF 2014/10 31 HD 0 NA Study
J 1 V 2015/10 34 HD 0 6 2300 710 2800
K–G 0

SF slow freezing, V vitrification

(Kyono K. JSFI, 2016)