Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;7(5):460–468. doi: 10.3892/br.2017.985

Table III.

Comparison of PGI, PGII, G-17 levels and the PGI:II ratio between subjects with histological non CAG, CAG, IM and gastric adenocarcinoma.

Histological finding

Serum biomarker Non CAG (n=48) CAG (n=12) IM (n=9) Gastric adenocarcinoma (n=3) P-valuea
PG I, µg/l 138.9 (98.0–218.0) 108.7 (47.5–167.2) 116.6 (76.9–167.2) 191.3 0.261
P-valueb 0.100 0.175 0.925
PG II, µg/l 10.2 (6.0–12.7) 7.7 (5.8–12.4) 10.9 (8.3–13.1) 17.6 0.096
P-valueb 0.657 0.470 0.012c
PGI:II ratio 15.7 (11.4–19.2) 10.1 (6.5–16.2) 12.0 (8.6–15.4) 3.8 0.016c
P-valueb 0.027c 0.031c 0.075
G-17, pmol/l 3.75 (1.4–11.9) 6.75 (2.8–57.4) 5.1 (2.3–15.1) 0.9 0.311
P-valueb 0.074 0.031 0.555

Data are provided as medians with interquartile range.

a

Kruskal-Wallis test

b

Mann-Whitney U test vs. histological non CAG

c

P<0.05 vs. histological non CAG. PG, pepsinogen; CAG, chronic atrophic gastritis; IM, intestinal metaplasia; G-17, gastrin-17; SD, standard deviation.