Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 22;10:51. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0232-3

Table 3.

The breadth of the quality of evidence concerning foot health management categorised by theme of recommendations and AGREE II score of publication

Theme 1* 2* 3* 4* 5* 6* 7* /*
Core podiatry [A] Low High, very low Moderate Moderate-very low Low-very low
Foot ulcer care [B] High-low High-very low High-very low High-very low High-very low High-very low
Foot health education [C] Low High-very low High-very low High-very low
Preventative care or assessments [D] Low High-very low High-very low High-very low High-very low
Preventative care or advancements [E] High-very low Moderate-low High-very low Moderate-very low
Clinical interventions [F] Moderate-very low Moderate-low High-very low High-low High-very low High-very low High
Podiatric surgery [G] Low Moderate-very low High-very low
Other [H]
Pain medication [I] Moderate High, low-very low Very low
Antibiotics [J] Moderate-very low High-very low Moderate-low Very low Moderate-low
Orthopaedic surgery [K] High-low Very low
Antifungal medication [L] Moderate Low
Footwear assessments [M] High-moderate High-very low High-very low

* Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system