Table 2.
Reference in chronological order | Numerator (n) | Denominator (d) | Coverage (n/d) (%) | Timeframe of the scaling-up process | Reported successful coverage | Reported impact on main health outcomes | Used framework | Used framework | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regions | Sites | Providers | Patients | Regions | Sites | Providers | Patients | Regions | Sites | Providers | Patients | Months | + | – | Unclear | + | – | Unclear | Name | No | |
Frieden et al. [51] | 10,000,000 | 74 | 30 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | |||||||||||||||
Price et al. [52] | 30 | 6 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | ||||||||||||||||
Mutevedzi et al. [53] | 5719 | 16 | 48 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | |||||||||||||||
Renju et al. [54] | 429 | 4 | 177 | 39 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | ||||||||||||||
Curry et al. [55] | 30 | e | 18 | ⊠ | ⊠ | ⊠ | |||||||||||||||
Goetz et al. [56] | 15c | 12 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | ||||||||||||||||
Li et al. [57] | 157 | 63 | 323 | 49 | 22 | ⊠ | ⊠ | RE-AIM | |||||||||||||
Miyano et al. [58] | 8 | ≤ 36 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | ||||||||||||||||
Comfort et al. [59] | 49d | 400,335d | ≤ 72 | ⊠ | ⊠ | ⊠ | |||||||||||||||
Legesse et al. [60] | 13,500 | a | 4 | 70,000,000 | 31 | ⊠ | ⊠ | ⊠ | |||||||||||||
Solberg et al. [61] | 2348 | 75 | 63 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | |||||||||||||||
Sim et al. [62] | 74 | 956 | 77 | 1004 | 96 | 95 | 57 | ⊠g | ⊠ | ⊠ | |||||||||||
Munos et al. [63] | 9 | f | 35 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ | |||||||||||||||
Singh et al. [64] | b | 744 | 43 | ⊠ | ⊠g | ⊠ |
RE-AIM Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance
aAuthors reported that the EBP reached an estimated 10,230,450 under-5s
bAuthors provided coverage information for some indicators (d = 744 sites): early antenatal care (n = 11,671 patients), skilled delivery (n = 9573 patients), and underweight in infants (n = 7685 patients)
cSum of seven and eight facilities of two arms of this trial
dSum of 13 rural health centers (covering 160,000 persons), 19 primary health centers and 17 rural health centers (covering 240,335 persons)
eAuthors provided information on achieved coverage for some indicators (d = 30 sites): access to water (from 27 to 100%), access to electricity (from 73 to 97%), and health center staffing (from 75 to 90%)
fAuthors provided information on program targets, baseline, and achieved levels of mortality and coverage: under-five mortality rate (target, 82.5 deaths per 1000; baseline, 110 deaths per 1000; achieved, 103 deaths per 1000), ≥ 4 antenatal care visits (targeted, 80%; baseline, 45%; achieved, 44%), intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy (targeted, 70%; baseline, 44%; achieved, 39%), skilled birth attendance (targeted, 60%; baseline, 80%; achieved, 73%), cesarian section (targeted, 2%; baseline, 3%; achieved, 2%), early initiation of breast-feeding (targeted, 40%; baseline, 25%; achieved, 26%), postpartum vitamin A (targeted, 60%; baseline, 50%; achieved, 57%), artemisinin combination therapy for fever (targeted, 70%; baseline, 27%; achieved, 23%), antibiotics for pneumonia (targeted, 60%; baseline, 30%; achieved, 16%), oral rehydration therapy + continued feeding (targeted, 60%; baseline, 65%; achieved, 64%), insecticide-treated bednets (targeted, 70%; baseline, 51%; achieved, 92%), exclusive breast-feeding (targeted, 20%; baseline, 35%; achieved, 42%), vitamin A supplementation (targeted, 90%; baseline, 89%; achieved, 93%)
gQuantitatively reported successful coverage or impact of scaling-up strategy
⊠ is a checkmark for this item