Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 7;6(3):345–353. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.044

Table 3.

Hierarchical linear regression model when difference scores of Conner’s Adult ADHD Rating Scale were taken as dependent variables

Unstandardized coefficients Standardized coefficient t p
B Standard error β
Inattention/memory problems
Model 1a BDI 0.456 0.144 .448 3.166 .003**
BAI 0.207 0.132 .232 1.563 .124
AUDIT-K 0.126 0.120 .114 1.051 .298
BIS-11 −0.032 0.076 −.043 −0.424 .673
Model 2b BDI 0.466 0.141 .458 3.313 .002**
BAI 0.065 0.149 .073 0.437 .664
AUDIT-K 0.115 0.117 .104 0.982 .330
BIS-11 −0.083 0.078 −.112 −1.060 .294
WURS-KS 0.098 0.050 .263 1.944 .057
Model 3c BDI 0.355 0.140 .349 2.545 .014*
BAI 0.060 0.141 .067 0.425 .672
AUDIT-K 0.092 0.112 .083 0.821 .415
BIS-11 −0.119 0.076 −.161 −1.579 .120
WURS-KS 0.071 0.049 .191 1.457 .151
YIAT 0.122 0.045 .311 2.691 .009**
Hyperactivity/restless
Model 1d BDI 0.065 0.119 .072 0.543 .589
BAI 0.380 0.109 .484 3.474 .001**
AUDIT-K 0.303 0.099 .312 3.060 .003**
BIS-11 −0.002 0.063 −.003 −0.033 .974
Model 2e BDI 0.072 0.117 .080 0.612 .543
BAI 0.280 0.124 .357 2.265 .027*
AUDIT-K 0.296 0.098 .304 3.023 .004**
BIS-11 −0.038 0.065 −.058 −0.579 .565
WURS-KS 0.069 0.042 .210 1.635 .108
Model 3f BDI −0.030 0.115 −.033 −0.261 .795
BAI 0.275 0.116 .351 2.384 .021*
AUDIT-K 0.274 0.092 .281 2.989 .004**
BIS-11 −0.071 0.062 −.109 −1.143 .258
WURS-KS 0.044 0.040 .134 1.098 .277
YIAT 0.111 0.037 .325 3.003 .004**
Impulsivity/emotional lability
Model 1g BDI 0.166 0.138 .171 1.201 .235
BAI 0.365 0.127 .428 2.872 .006**
AUDIT-K 0.207 0.115 .196 1.797 .078
BIS-11 0.012 0.073 .017 0.169 .866
Model 2h BDI 0.177 0.134 .182 1.319 .193
BAI 0.215 0.141 .252 1.519 .134
AUDIT-K 0.195 0.112 .185 1.749 .086
BIS-11 −0.042 0.075 −.059 −0.558 .579
WURS-KS 0.104 0.048 .291 2.159 .035*
Model 3i BDI 0.060 0.131 .062 0.459 .648
BAI 0.209 0.132 .246 1.586 .118
AUDIT-K 0.170 0.105 .161 1.630 .109
BIS-11 −0.080 0.071 −.113 −1.124 .266
WURS-KS 0.075 0.046 .212 1.645 .106
YIAT 0.128 0.042 .343 3.016 .004**
Problems with self-concept
Model 1j BDI 0.873 0.202 .572 4.330 <.001**
BAI 0.156 0.185 .116 0.841 .404
AUDIT-K 0.136 0.168 .082 0.810 .421
BIS-11 0.124 0.106 .112 1.172 0.246
Model 2k BDI 0.884 0.200 .579 4.424 <.001**
BAI 0.005 0.211 .004 0.025 .980
AUDIT-K 0.125 0.167 .075 0.748 .458
BIS-11 0.070 0.111 .063 0.629 .532
WURS-KS 0.104 0.072 .186 1.452 .152
Model 3l BDI 0.768 0.204 .504 3.763 <.001**
BAI <0.001 0.206 .000 0.000 .999
AUDIT-K 0.100 0.163 .060 0.613 .543
BIS-11 0.033 0.111 .029 0.295 .769
WURS-KS 0.076 0.072 .136 1.064 .292
YIAT 0.126 0.066 .215 1.907 .062

Note. BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; BAI: Beck Anxiety Inventory; BIS-11: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11; AUDIT-K: Korean version of Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test; WURS-KS: Korean Short version of Wender Utah Rating Scale; YIAT: Korean version of Young’s Internet Addiction Test.

a

Variables entered in the first step: BDI, BAI, AUDIT-K, BIS-11; F = 11.485; df = 4, 56; p < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.411.

b

Variables entered in the second step: WURS-KS; F = 10.400; df = 5, 55; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.439; R2 change = 0.035.

c

Variables entered in the third step: YIAT; F = 10.858; df = 6, 54; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.496; R2 change = 0.061.

d

Variables entered in the first step: BDI, BAI, AUDIT-K, BIS-11; F = 14.867; df = 4, 56; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.480.

e

Variables entered in the second step: WURS-KS; F = 12.784; df = 5, 55; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.495; R2 change = 0.022.

f

Variables entered in the third step: YIAT; F = 13.708; df = 6, 54; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.560; R2 change = 0.066.

g

Variables entered in the first step: BDI, BAI, AUDIT-K, BIS-11; F = 11.194; df = 4, 56; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.405.

h

Variables entered in the second step: WURS-KS; F = 10.473; df = 5, 55; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.441; R2 change = 0.043.

i

Variables entered in the third step: YIAT; F = 11.528; df = 6, 54; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.513; R2 change = 0.074.

j

Variables entered in the first step: BDI, BAI, AUDIT-KS, BIS-11; F = 15.259; df = 4, 56; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.487.

k

Variables entered in the second step: WURS-KS; F = 12.870; df = 5, 55; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.497; R2 change = 0.018.

l

Variables entered in the third step: YIAT; F = 11.846; df = 6, 54; < .001; adjusted R2 = 0.520; R2 change = 0.029.

*< .05. **< .01.