Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 30;6(3):387–395. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.055

Table 2.

Model effects for absolute power

Absolute power (μV2) χ2 df p Post hoc
Delta
Group 0.41 2 .814
Group × Region 6.80 4 .147
Group × Hemisphere 9.01 4 .061
Group × Region × Hemisphere 19.04* 8 .015 N.S.
Theta
Group 5.27 2 .072
Group × Region 24.67*** 4 <.001 Central: HI < LI
Group × Hemisphere 13.48** 4 .009 N.S.
Group × Region × Hemisphere 40.74*** 8 <.001 Midline central: HI < LI, MI
Alpha
Group 10.64** 2 .005 HI < LI
Group × Region 41.68*** 4 <.001 Frontal: HI < LI
Central: HI < LI, MI
Group × Hemisphere 24.97*** 4 <.001 Midline: HI < LI, MI
Group × Region × Hemisphere 55.49*** 8 <.001 Left central: HI < MI
Midline frontal: HI < LI
Midline central: HI < LI, MI
Right frontal: HI < LI
Beta
Group 2.28 2 .320
Group × Region 19.74** 4 .001 N.S.
Group × Hemisphere 16.28** 4 .003 N.S.
Group × Region × Hemisphere 18.95* 8 .015 Midline central: HI < LI, MI
Gamma
Group 0.72 2 .698
Group × Region 2.15 4 .709
Group × Hemisphere 7.10 4 .131
Group × Region × Hemisphere 23.68** 8 .003 N.S.

Note. The Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparison was used (p < .0167). LI: low-impulsivity group; MI: middle-impulsivity group; HI: high-impulsivity group; N.S.: not significant.

*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.