Table 6.
Effects on YouTube addiction | Exogenous variables | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content gratification | Social gratification | Process gratification | Technology gratification | YouTube content creation | YouTube content viewing | |
Effect a | 0.222** | 0.163** | −0.121** | 0.121** | ||
SE | 0.080 | 0.081 | 0.049 | 0.049 | ||
LB | 0.064 | 0.005 | −0.217 | 0.025 | ||
UB | 0.376 | 0.319 | −0.026 | 0.216 | ||
Effect b | −0.413*** | −0.068ns | −0.487*** | 0.096** | 0.936*** | 0.528*** |
SE | 0.066 | 0.063 | 0.046 | 0.036 | 0.039 | 0.044 |
LB | −0.549 | −0.188 | −0.575 | 0.022 | 0.860 | 0.438 |
UB | −0.289 | 0.059 | −0.394 | 0.163 | 1.014 | 0.612 |
Effect c | 0.636*** | 0.231*** | 0.366*** | 0.025ns | ||
SE | 0.066 | 0.057 | 0.043 | 0.033 | ||
LB | 0.507 | 0.121 | 0.284 | −0.041 | ||
UB | 0.769 | 0.345 | 0.451 | 0.090 |
Note. All the effects are standardized. These are calculated through factor scores imputed from the measurement models. Effects a, b, and c denote total, direct, and indirect effects. n = 410; bootstrap iterations = 2,000; bias-corrected percentile bootstrap method. SE: standard error; LB: lower bound effect; UB: upper bound effect; ns: not significant.
**p < .05. ***p < .001.