Skip to main content
. 2017 Aug 2;6(2):175–187. doi: 10.1007/s40120-017-0077-5

Table 2.

Clinical endpoints at 2 years across ethnic subgroups (integrated analysis of DEFINE and CONFIRM)

Endpoint Black patientsa Hispanic patientsa Asian patientsb ITT populationb
Placebo (n = 19) DMFc (n = 10) Placebo (n = 23) DMFc (n = 31) Placebo (n = 70) DMFc (n = 66) Placebo (n = 771) DMFc (n = 769)
ARR
 Adjusted relapse rate (95% CI) 0.27 (0.13–0.55) 0.01 (0.00–0.29) 0.49 (0.14–1.68) 0.15 (0.04–0.56) 0.21 (0.05–0.93) 0.14 (0.03–0.66) 0.37 (0.33–0.42) 0.19 (0.16–0.22)
 Rate ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) 0.05 (0.00–1.07) 0.31 (0.10–0.95) 0.64 (0.30–1.34) 0.52 (0.43–0.62)d
PPR
 Estimated proportion relapsed, % 38 0 34 18 40 28 44 28
 Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) 0.07 (0.00–0.33) 0.55 (0.07–1.28) 0.66 (0.35–1.24) 0.57 (0.48–0.69)d
Disability progression
 Estimated proportion with CDP at 12 weeks, % 57 43 30 8 25 20 22 15
 Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) 0.53 (0.02–1.39) 0.17 (0.00–0.60)e 0.71 (0.32–1.58) 0.68 (0.52–0.88)f

ARR annualized relapse rate, CDP confirmed disability progression, CI confidence interval, PPR proportion of patients relapsed

aARR, PPR, and proportion with CDP analyzed using Bayesian methodology (CI denotes credible interval)

bARR, PPR, and proportion with CDP analyzed using classical methodology (CI denotes confidence interval)

cDMF denotes delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF)

d p < 0.001

eLower CI value was rounded to zero

f p < 0.005