Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 24;7:16270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16465-4

Table 2.

Comparison of osseointegration proximal and distal to the growth plate.

BV/TV (%) BA/TA (%)
Distal Proximal P-value Distal Proximal P-value
PEO 0 weeks 34.50 (4.85) 48.00 (5.29) 0.003a 21.83 (9.60) 29.50 (2.95) 0.057
2 weeks 52.33 (6.28) 65.50 (6.95) 0.020a 34.50 (8.98) 47.00 (8.99) 0.062
4 weeks 39.17 (3.06) 58.17 (5.53) 0.001a 23.33 (3.20) 40.50 (3.39) 0.001a
6 weeks 34.83 (8.86) 43.83 (8.80) 0.173 19.83 (8.61) 25.50 (6.06) 0.190
Ti 0 weeks 36.83 (11.74) 47.33 (2.80) 0.068 21.17 (9.62) 26.50 (5.89) 0.057
2 weeks 46.00 (4.60)b 59.83 (5.38) 0.008a 28.50 (5.32) 40.33 (9.27)b 0.011a
4 weeks 35.17 (5.56) 51.50 (8.76) 0.021a 16.83 (3.76)b 32.50 (9.31) 0.025a
6 weeks 34.83 (5.56) 47.83 (8.18) 0.034a 19.67 (5.99) 28.50 (8.34) 0.122

The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. aP < 0.05 indicates a significant difference between distal and proximal regions. bP < 0.05 indicates a significant difference in osseointegration between PEO and Ti at a given time and site. BV/TV, bone volume density; BA/TA; bone area density; PEO, plasma electrolytic oxidation; Ti, titanium.