Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 24;7:16269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16560-6

Table 2.

SPINGO species classification of key genera identified in SD vs ID comparison.

Key genera Species SD (%) ID (%)
Bacteroides Bacteroides coprocola 2.97 ± 1.01 1.20 ± 0.25
Bacteroides heparinolyticus 2.47 ± 0.85 1.38 ± 0.19
Bacteroides plebeius 1.00 ± 0.24 3.00 ± 0.58*
Bacteroides salanitronis 4.37 ± 0.58 0.45 ± 0.15**
Parabacteroides Parabacteroides merdae 3.69 ± 0.80 0.82 ± 0.51*
Elusimicrobiaceae Elusimicrobium minutum 0.23 ± 0.06 1.51 ± 0.52*
Clostridiales Alkaliphilus crotonatoxidans 1.74 ± 0.34 3.04 ± 0.77
Alkaliphilus transvaalensis 0.12 ± 0.04 1.25 ± 0.32**
Christensenella minuta 0.66 ± 0.10 3.39 ± 0.35**
Vallitalea guaymasensis 0.40 ± 0.06 1.03 ± 0.17*
Oscillospira Flavonifractor plautii 1.36 ± 0.16 4.61 ± 0.71**
Intestinimonas butyriciproducens 3.13 ± 0.29 4.61 ± 0.61
Oscillibacter valericigenes 2.61 ± 0.41 2.70 ± 0.09
Ruminococcus Clostridium leptum 0.53 ± 0.04 1.06 ± 0.20
Veillonellaceae Unclussified sp 1.25 ± 0.15 0.41 ± 0.07**
Fusobacterium Unclussified sp 6.02 ± 2.77 0.26 ± 0.08**
Succinivibrionaceae Succinatimonas hippei 1.61 ± 0.21 0.25 ± 0.08**

Only species with relative abundance >1% are reported (mean ± SEM; n = 6/group). Variations in species’ relative abundances between SD and ID were assessed using nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test taking into account False Discovery Rate (FDR) corrected p-values; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.