Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov-Dec;25(6):586–595. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0112

Table 3. Mean difference between time samplings (T1-T0) and (T2-T0) for all monitored bacterial levels according to periodontal diagnosis and laboratorial techniques.

Diagnosis Laboratorial technique Bacterial levels Difference Mean ± Standard deviation Signal test (p-value) Mann-Whitney (test p-value)
Gingivitis qPCR Total bacterial load (primer universal) T1-T0 -1,840.8 ± 29,467.9 0.83 0.96
T2-T0 1,019.4 ± 24,730.7 0.83
Porphyromonas gingivalis T1-T0 0.6 ± 2.3 0.16 0.19
T2 -T0 0.0 ± 1.2 1.00
Culture Aerobic bacterial levels T1-T0 16.3 ± 101.2 0.79 0.02
T2-T0 93.3 ± 239.8 0.004
Anaerobic bacterial levels T1-T0 6.0 ± 13.9 0.018 0.82
T2-T0 5.1 ± 12.7 0.026
Periodontitis qPCR Total bacterial load (primer universal) T1-T0 -4,456.6 ± 57,744.6 0.20 0.52
T2-T0 -9,726.8 ± 55,713.3 0.81
Porphyromonas gingivalis T1-T0 0.1 ± 2.3 0.82 0.90
T2-T0 512.0 ± 2,659.3 0.43
Culture Aerobic bacterial levels T1-T0 107.6 ± 353.5 0.09 0.27
T2-T0 53.7 ± 213.1 0.65
Anaerobic T1 -T0 2.2 ± 9.7 0.40 0.25
bacterial levels T2-T0 40.1 ± 192.0 0.03

Signal test checked if the following differences, T1-T0 and T2-T0, were different from zero. Mann-Whitney test compared difference TITO with difference T2-T0. Results were considered statistically significant when p<0.05 (95% confidence interval)