Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov-Dec;25(6):586–595. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0112

Table 4. Comparative mean periodontal clinical (periodontal pocket depth - PD and clinical attachment level - CAL) and microbiological parameters (total bacterial load and levels of P gingivalis in subgingival samples), between positive and negative bacteremia individuals, according to periodontal diagnosis. Data for the entire study population is also shown.

Periodontal diagnosis Bacteremia (blood samples culture) Periodontal pocket depth -PD Mean ± Standard deviation Clinical attachment level -CAL Mean ± Standard deviation
Gingivitis Negative 1.9 ± 0.8 0.6 ± 0.7
Positive 1.8 ± 0.5 1.0 ± 0.8
p-value 0.87 0.27
Periodontitis Negative 3.2 ± 1.3 3.7 ± 0.8
Positive 4.3 ± 1.3 4.6 ± 2.4
p-value 0.17 0.39
Total population Negative 2.1 ± 1.0 1.1 ± 1.4
Positive 3.5 ± 1.6 3.4 ± 2.7
p-value 0.0028 0.0014
Periodontal diagnosis Bacteremia (blood samples culture) Total bacterial load (qPCR - primer universal) Mean ± Standard deviation Levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis (qPCR) Mean ± Standard deviation
Gingivitis Negative 867,152.4 ±1,267,836.5 121,653.7 ± 432,896.3
Positive 927,803.2 ± 927,237.2 1.5 ± 3.1
p-value 0.46 0.26
Periodontitis Negative 163,445.2 ± 38,278.0 22,485.4 ± 38,942.6
Positive 3,223,390.4 ± 6,323,937.5 150,671.0 ± 301,174.9
p-value 0.0044 0.42
Total population Negative 742,968.8 ± 1,175,869.3 104,153.4 ± 392,390.1
Positive 2,436,331.9 ± 5,232,368.3 99,012.9 ± 252,898.2
p-value 0.005 0.32

Mann-Whitney test (bacteremia positive vs. bacteremia negative). Results were considered statistically significant when p<0.05 (95% confidence interval).