Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 10;8:894. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00894

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of CXL-1020 and MIL effects on systemic and LV hemodynamic indices in instrumented anesthetized rats and cardiomyocyte function. Summary data comparing as % change from baseline of (A) Tau (n = 6) and (B) myocyte function (n = 14–17 cells/7–8 hearts) in ISO rats. (C) Summary data as % change from baseline of a dose response of CXL-1020 and MIL in normal rats on contractile changes (CaT and shortening amplitude) and (D) relaxation (CaT and relengthening RT50), 7–25 cells/5–8 hearts. (E) Summary data as % change from baseline of CXL-1020 and MIL on heart rate in normal, RW and ISO rats (n = 5–7). (F) The time course of ectopic beats/per minute from the LV-pressure curve during IV infusion (n = 12–13). *P < 0.05 vs CXL-1020.