Table 2.

The upper section shows Pearson's inter-correlations for the initial block of diagnostic tests. The middle section shows that the classical measure of directional bisection error (DBE), from the bisection of individual lines, correlated only modestly with other diagnostic procedures (cancellation, copying and drawing), but that the correlations were significantly stronger if EWB from an endpoint weightings analysis was used to index bias in the bisection task. The lower section shows that the second composite measure from the endpoint weightings analysis, EWS, also had some degree of correlation with diagnostic measures of neglect. The bottom row shows the multiple correlation obtained using a linear combination of the two endpoint weightings measures (EWB + EWS). ltalic values indicate non-significant correlations, correcting for false discovery rate within the full correlation matrix for ten dependent measures (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995).

	LINES
	0.75	STARS
	0.62	0.74	COPY
	0.41	0.56	0.50	DRAW
	0.68	0.71	0.65	0.32	MULTI-BISECT

DBE	0.39	0.38	0.30	0.20	0.63
EWB	0.54	0.58	0.50	0.35	0.77
difference	t = 2.26 p < 0.05	t = 3.18 p < 0.005	t = 3.00 p < 0.005	t = 2.04 p < 0.05	t = 2.74 p < 0.01

EWS	−0.28	−0.48	−0.43	−0.25	−0.34
EWB + EWS	0.58	0.71	0.62	0.41	0.81