Table A2.

Correlation matrix for neglect tests for sub-sample for whom a Centre of Cancellation (CoC) measure could be computed for the line and star cancellation. Coefficients above the diagonal are Pearson’s r (untransformed data), and coefficients below the diagonal are Spearman’s ρ (ranked data). To control for the false discovery rate, correlations weaker than 0.44 (positive or negative) are classed as non-significant, and are reported in italic (Benjamini and Hochberg, 1995). The main patterns of the full cohort are preserved in this sub-sample, regardless of which measure of cancellation performance is used. Specifically, DBE for individual lines correlates poorly with cancellation and other core measures of neglect, but EWB correlates much better, and EWS captures some additional variance in cancellation and copying performance. Note that the CoC scores are included, along with the other dependent measures, in the data spreadsheet that accompanies this study.

r ρ	LINES (CoC)	LINES	STARS (CoC)	STARS	COPY	DRAW	DBE_MULTI	DBE	EWB	EWS	EWB + EWS
LINES (CoC)		1.0	0.74	0.7	0.48	0.38	0.47	0.34	0.46	−0.44	0.54
LINES	0.99		0.74	0.72	0.51	0.4	0.48	0.32	0.48	−0.46	0.56
STARS (CoC)	0.76	0.75		0.95	0.54	0.55	0.63	0.41	0.57	−0.42	0.61
STARS	0.8	0.78	0.95		0.66	0.56	0.65	0.45	0.63	−0.47	0.68
COPY	0.65	0.58	0.52	0.63		0.53	0.70	0.43	0.63	−0.50	0.69
DRAW	0.47	0.5	0.51	0.53	0.50		0.23	0.29	0.41	−0.23	0.42
DBE_MULTI	0.62	0.57	0.65	0.70	0.61	0.16		0.61	0.79	−0.54	0.83
DBE	0.29	0.24	0.30	0.36	0.39	0.04	0.46		0.81	−0.31	0.81
EWB	0.57	0.56	0.58	0.60	0.56	0.30	0.80	0.58		−0.39
EWS	−0.5	−0.47	−0.48	−0.55	−0.51	−0.29	−0.57	−0.49	−0.51
EWB + EWS	0.62	0.6	0.62	0.66	0.62	0.34	0.83	0.62