Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e018593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018593

Table 4.

Characteristics of all 349 discordant recommendations in UpToDate and proportion of appropriate discordant recommendations

n (%) Per cent of appropriate discordant (P value)
Clinical Specialties (P=0.160)*
 Primary Care and General internal Medicine 15(4.3) 53.3
 Emergency Medicine 16(4.6) 81.3
 Critical Care 5(1.4) 80.0
 Internal Medicine specialties 158(45.3) 57.6
 Oncology (including haemato-oncology) 43(12.3) 55.8
 Paediatrics 73(20.9) 47.9
 Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Women Health 19(5.4) 73.7
 General Surgery 13(3.7) 69.2
 Anaesthesiology 3(0.9) 100.0
 Psychiatry 4(1.1) 75.0
Intervention type (P=0.010)
 Drug intervention 197(56.4) 61.4
 Surgical interventions 69(19.8) 59.4
 Medical device 24(6.9) 62.5
 Behavioural or multidisciplinary intervention 35(10.0) 57.1
 Diagnostic test, screening programmes 24(6.9) 29.2
Clarity of the comparator (P<0.001)
 Comparator not at all clear—uncertain 46(13.2) 37.0
 Comparator not clearly and explicitly stated or obvious but relatively easy to infer 120(34.4) 48.3
 Comparator not clearly and explicitly stated but obvious 110(31.5) 68.2
 Comparator clearly and explicitly stated 73(20.9) 74.0
Type of comparator (P=0.083)
 Too unclear 25(7.2) 44.0
 No intervention (or placebo) 126(36.1) 54.0
 Other intervention(s) (standard of care or alternative(s)) 198(56.7) 63.1
Direction of the recommendation (P<0.001)
 For the intervention (ie, against the comparator) 274(78.5) 51.1
 Against the intervention (ie, for the comparator) 75(21.5) 85.3
Mortality (P<0.001)
 No statement about mortality 189(54.2) 47.1
 Implicit statement about mortality 47(13.5) 68.1
 Explicit statement about mortality 113(32.4) 73.5
Balance of benefits and harms (P<0.001)
 No statement about the balance of outcomes 100(28.7) 28.0
 Implicit statement about the balance of outcomes 157(45.0) 66.9
 Explicit statement about the balance of outcomes 92(26.4) 77.2
Relative importance of outcomes—values and preferences (P<0.001)
 No statement about the relative importance of outcomes 168(48.1) 42.9
 Implicit statement about the relative importance of outcomes 171(49.0) 73.1
 Explicit statement about the relative importance of outcomes 10(2.9) 70.0
Cost of resources (P=0.023)
 No statement about cost or resources 334(95.7) 57.2
 Cost or resources clearly and explicitly stated 15(4.3) 86.7
Supporting SR (P=0.175)
 No SR is cited 300(86.0) 56.3
 SR of observational studies 22(6.3) 63.6
 SR of both RCT and observational studies 13(3.7) 76.9
 SR of RCT 14(4.0) 78.6
Design of primary studies (P=0.002)
 No reference cited 45(12.9) 35.6
 Other type (eg, narrative review, book chapter) 48(13.8) 54.2
 Observational studies 203(58.2) 61.1
 RCT 53(15.2) 71.7
Total 349(100) 58.5

*The null hypothesis for the p value is that the proportions do not differ across categories.

RCT, randomised controlled trials; SR, systematic review.