Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 16;7(11):e018593. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018593

Table 5.

Summary judgements on the appropriateness of 349 discordant strong recommendation based on low certainty in effect in UpToDate

n(%)
Appropriate discordant recommendations (consistent with GRADE)
 1. Life-threatening (or catastrophical) situation 70(20.1)
 2. Uncertain benefit, certain harm 28(8.0)
 3. Potential similar benefits, one clearly less risky (or costly) 56(16.0)
 4. Established similar benefits, one potentially more risky (or costly) 18(5.2)
 5. Potential catastrophic harm 32(9.2)
Total 204(58.5)
Inappropriate discordant recommendations (inconsistent with GRADE)
 6. Good practice statement 47(13.5)
 7. Misclassification of certainty (judged moderate or high) 38(10.9)
 8. Lack of explanation, should have been weak recommendation (GRADE 2C) 60(17.2)
Total 145(41.5)

GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.