Table 2.
β | t | R 2 | R 2 change | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DV: Performing the tick check | ||||
Model 1: | .13 | .11 | ||
Proximal goal | .33 | 7.99** | ||
Model 2: | .20 | .07 | ||
Proximal goal | .30 | 7.57** | ||
Self-efficacy | .27 | 6.79** | ||
Model 3: | .26 | .05 | ||
Proximal goal | .22 | 5.04** | ||
Self-efficacy | .24 | 5.89** | ||
Outcome expectations: | ||||
Perceived severity | .02 | 0.40 | ||
Response efficacy | −.08 | −1.46 | ||
Self-evaluative | .20 | 3.57** | ||
Injunctive norm | −.12 | −2.68** | ||
Descriptive norm | .17 | 3.77** | ||
Model 4: | .28 | .02 | ||
Proximal goal | .23 | 5.22** | ||
Self-efficacy | .22 | 5.31** | ||
Outcome expectations: | ||||
Perceived severity | .02 | .58 | ||
Response efficacy | −.10 | −1.87 | ||
Self-evaluative | .21 | 3.74** | ||
Injunctive norm | −.11 | −2.65** | ||
Descriptive norm | .16 | 3.81** | ||
Knowledge | .05 | 1.11 | ||
Experience | .13 | 3.04** |
All models controlled for level of education (R 2 = 0.02); ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05