Table 3.
Regression analysis to test associations between SCT-determinants and proximal goal to do the tick check (DV)
| β | t | R 2 | R 2 change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DV: Proximal goal to do the tick check | ||||
| Model 1: | .02 | .01 | ||
| Self-efficacy | .12 | 2.61** | ||
| Model 2: | .25 | .23 | ||
| Self-efficacy | .02 | .41 | ||
| Outcome expectations: | ||||
| Perceived severity | .01 | .16 | ||
| Response efficacy | .04 | 0.78 | ||
| Self-evaluative | .43 | 8.05** | ||
| Injunctive norm | .04 | .93 | ||
| Descriptive norm | .02 | .46 | ||
| Model 3: | .25 | .00 | ||
| Self-efficacy | .02 | .50 | ||
| Outcome expectations: | ||||
| Perceived severity | .01 | .13 | ||
| Response efficacy | .04 | .83 | ||
| Self-evaluative | .43 | 7.97** | ||
| Injunctive norm | .04 | .91 | ||
| Descriptive norm | .02 | .46 | ||
| Knowledge | −.01 | −.16 | ||
| Experience | −.02 | −.47 | ||
All models controlled for gender (R 2 = 0.01); ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05