Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 25;11:70. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0177-8

Table 2.

Clinical outcome summary scores from clinician interview for patients with psychosis

Program (n = 53) Control (n = 21) ANCOVA Full cohort (n = 74)
Mean SD Mean (SD) Effect size
F, partial eta2
P-value* Mean (SD) Effect size
Z, r
P-value**
PANSS positive and negative < 0.01, < 0.01 0.96 6.87, 0.80 < 0.0001
Baseline 25.5 12.1 24.9 11.9 25.3 − 12
end point 7.9 7.4 10.3 12.2 8.6 − 9
Δ score − 17.6 12.5 − 14.6 14.1 − 16.8 − 12.9
PANSS positive 1.22, 0.02 0.22 6.87, 0.80 < 0.0001
Baseline 11.6 6.8 13.1 5.7 12 6.5
end point 2.7 3.3 3.7 4.6 3 4.6
Δ score − 8.9 7.7 − 9.3 7.5 − 9 7.5
PANSS negative 2.16, 0.03 0.69 6.42, 0.75 < 0.0001
Baseline 13.9 7.3 11.8 7.4 13.3 7.4
end point 5.2 5.3 6.6 7.7 5.6 6.1
Δ score − 8.7 7 − 5.2 8 − 7.7 7.4
HAM-D  0.02, < 0.01 0.27 6.02, 0.70 < 0.0001
Baseline 15.6 7.2 16.3 7.8 15.8 7.3
end point 7.7 4.5 8.0 6.7 7.8 6.7
Δ score − 7.8 8.0 − 8.4 11.3 − 8.0 9.0

HAM-D Hamilton Depression Scale, PANSS positive and negative syndrome scale

* P-value taken from ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) for each scale comparing program vs. control scores at end point, adjusted for baseline score

** P-value from Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test comparing baseline to end point scores (full cohort)