Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 25;11:70. doi: 10.1186/s13033-017-0177-8

Table 3.

Functional and familial burden for psychosis

Program (n = 48) Control (n = 17) ANCOVA Full cohort T
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Effect size
F, partial eta2
P-val* Mean (SD) Effect Size
Z, r
P-val**
WHODAS 0.52, 0.01 0.52 4.60, 0.57 < 0.0001
Baseline 46.1 (24.2) 37.4 (25.6) 43.8 (24.7)
end point 23.1 (20.8) 27.1 (30.9) 24.1 (23.7)
Δ score − 23.0 (27.0) − 10.3 (44.3) − 19.7 (32.6)
BAS 0.29, < 0.01 0.59 6.81, 0.84 < 0.0001
Baseline 76.5 (8.0) 76.0 (8.2) 76.4 (8.0)
end point 63.3 (6.5) 62.1 (9.3) 62.9 (7.3)
Δ score − 13.3 (8.6) − 13.9 (11.5) − 13.4 (9.4)
FIS: symptoms and social behavior 0.16, < 0.01 0.69 5.94, 0.74 < 0.0001
Baseline 46.5 (9.7) 41.2 (11.4) 45.1 (10.4)
end point 31.1 (9.4) 31.6 (11.0) 31.2 (9.8)
Δ Score − 15.4 (12.3) − 9.6 (15.8) − 13.9 (13.4)
FIS: impact on caregiver 2.02, 0.03 0.16 5.13, 0.64 < 0.0001
Baseline 12.0 (5.9) 10.9 (6.3) 11.7 (6.0)
end point 5.9 (4.3) 7.6 (5.7) 6.3 (4.7)
Δ score − 6.1 (6.4) − 3.3 (7.9) − 5.4 (6.9)

WHODAS World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 Short Version, BAS burden assessment schedule, FIS Family Interview Schedule

* P-value taken from ANCOVA (analysis of covariance) for each scale comparing program vs. control scores at end point, adjusted for baseline score

** P-value from Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test comparing baseline to end point scores (full cohort)