Table 3.
Discrepancy of tumor recurrence data
Patient | Indications in the databases | Blinded MD review | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
Trial | CR | Clinical Dx | Method of Dxa | Notes | |
COST trial | |||||
1 | Rec | Rec-free | New primary | CT, biopsy | Squamous cell CA of lung |
2 | Rec | Rec-free | New primary | Operative pathology | Metastatic breast CA; NED (colon CA) |
3 | Rec | Rec-free | New primary | Operative pathology | Adeno CA, transverse colon, T1N0 |
4 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec | Operative pathology | Liver and lung metastatic disease, both resected (10/1999)b |
Z0030 trial | |||||
1 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec | Bronchoscopy, biopsy | Local, previous resection margin |
2 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec | Operative pathology | Distant, right cerebellum |
3 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec | PET positive | Local/regional metastases to mediastinal nodes |
4 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec | Biopsy | Local, surgical scar |
5 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec | Bronchoscopy, biopsy | Metastatic in lung |
6 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec | Biopsy | Metastatic in lung/pleura |
7 | Rec-free | Rec | Rec | CT, biopsy | Local, previous resection margin |
8 | Rec | Rec-free | NED | CT | Clinician and radiologist per re-review of CT |
9 | Rec | Rec-free | New primary | Bronchoscopy, brushing | Opposite lung |
10 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec vs new primary | Treated with radiation | Too advanced to differentiate |
11 | Rec | Rec-free | Rec vs new primary | Treated with radiation | Too advanced to differentiate |
Rec, recurrence; CA, carcinoma; NED, no evidence of disease; CT, computer tomography; and PET, positron emission tomography.
All cases with discrepancies had radiographic imaging and a clinical impression by the treating MD. For all except two cases, the clinical impression was followed by additional confirmatory biopsies and histology or by treatment.
Clinical Dx, NED with Level 2 clinical impression based on 06/02/2008 medial record notes.