Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 25.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Trials. 2010 Aug 20;7(6):686–695. doi: 10.1177/1740774510380953

Table 3.

Discrepancy of tumor recurrence data

Patient Indications in the databases Blinded MD review


Trial CR Clinical Dx Method of Dxa Notes
COST trial
1 Rec Rec-free New primary CT, biopsy Squamous cell CA of lung
2 Rec Rec-free New primary Operative pathology Metastatic breast CA; NED (colon CA)
3 Rec Rec-free New primary Operative pathology Adeno CA, transverse colon, T1N0
4 Rec Rec-free Rec Operative pathology Liver and lung metastatic disease, both resected (10/1999)b
Z0030 trial
1 Rec Rec-free Rec Bronchoscopy, biopsy Local, previous resection margin
2 Rec Rec-free Rec Operative pathology Distant, right cerebellum
3 Rec Rec-free Rec PET positive Local/regional metastases to mediastinal nodes
4 Rec Rec-free Rec Biopsy Local, surgical scar
5 Rec Rec-free Rec Bronchoscopy, biopsy Metastatic in lung
6 Rec Rec-free Rec Biopsy Metastatic in lung/pleura
7 Rec-free Rec Rec CT, biopsy Local, previous resection margin
8 Rec Rec-free NED CT Clinician and radiologist per re-review of CT
9 Rec Rec-free New primary Bronchoscopy, brushing Opposite lung
10 Rec Rec-free Rec vs new primary Treated with radiation Too advanced to differentiate
11 Rec Rec-free Rec vs new primary Treated with radiation Too advanced to differentiate

Rec, recurrence; CA, carcinoma; NED, no evidence of disease; CT, computer tomography; and PET, positron emission tomography.

a

All cases with discrepancies had radiographic imaging and a clinical impression by the treating MD. For all except two cases, the clinical impression was followed by additional confirmatory biopsies and histology or by treatment.

b

Clinical Dx, NED with Level 2 clinical impression based on 06/02/2008 medial record notes.