Skip to main content
. 2017 May 17;15(3):e13249. doi: 10.5812/ijem.13249

Table 3. Lipid and Glycemic Profile at Baseline and After Six Weeks in Both Groupsa.

Variables Slow Weight Loss (n = 18) Rapid Weight Loss (n =18) Δ
Baseline End Baseline End Intragroupb Intragroupc Intergroupd
LDL (mg/dL) 105.9 ± 34.3 111.8 ± 26.5 120.9 ± 28.7 108.1 ± 27.1 5.91 ± 30.95 -12.8 ± 14.4f -18.7 ± 8.04f
HDL (mg/dL) 37.8 ± 5.4 39.7 ± 6.2 43.9 ± 9.5 45.1 ± 6.3 1.90 ± 5.95 1.16 ± 6.08 -0.73 ± 1.99
TG (mg/dL) 145.3 ± 65.8 109.6 ± 50.1 163.8 ± 70.5 118.5 ± 52.3 -35.6 ± 45.5f -45.3 ± 56.8f -9.66 ± 17.17
VLDL (mg/dL) 29.0 ± 13.1 21.9 ± 10.2 32.7 ± 14.1 23.7 ± 10.47 -7.11 ± 9.12f -9.05 ± 11.37f -1.93 ± 3.43
TC (mg/dL) 172.4 ± 40.5 173.5 ± 35.3 194.2 ± 39.6 176.8 ± 31.4 1.06 ± 33.64 -17.4 ± 19.6f -18.4 ± 9.1
FBS (mg/dL) 95.1 ± 11.1 99.0 ± 6.7 100.8 ± 18.8 95.0 ± 9.8 3.92 ± 10.36 -5.87 ± 11f -9.80 ± 3.57f
FINS (μIU/l) 13.2 ± 4.7 11.5 ± 5.4 11.2 ± 4.9 7.6 ± 4.3 -1.96 ± 2.52f -3.93 ± 3.61e -0.06 ± 1.96
HOMA-IR 1.7 ± 0.6 1.4 ± 0.6 1.5 ± 0.7 1.0 ± 0.5 -0.24 ± 0.6f -0.43 ± 0.46e -0.18 ± 049f
HOMA-B 126.1 ± 26.2 100.7 ± 23.4 106.6 ± 50 86.9 ± 42.9 -24.4 ± 25.8 -18.8 ± 45.5 5.36 ± 41.2
HOMA-S 64.4 ± 19.5 79.3 ± 29.6 84.7 ± 48.9 131.7 ± 67.7 14.3 ± 21.2e 44.2 ± 60.8f 26.1 ± 35.3f
QUICKI 0.32 ± 0.01 0.33 ± 0.02 0.33 ± 0.02 0.36 ± 0.03 0.01 ± 0.01f 0.03 ± 0.03e 1.16 ± 6.08f

Abbreviations:TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; FBS, fasting blood sugar; FINS, fasting insulin; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance; HOMA-B, HOMA-pancreatic beta cell function; HOMA-S, HOMA-insulin sensitivity; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index.

aAll values are means ± SD.

bChanges post-baseline in slow weight loss group.

cChanges post-baseline in rapid weight loss group.

dChanges between groups, for normally distributed variables, paired-samples t test and independent-sample t-test were used to investigate the differences within and between groups, respectively. For non-normally-distributed variables, the Wilcoxon signed ranks test and a Mann -Whitney U test were used to assess differences within and between groups, respectively.

eSignificant differences were assumed at P < 0.001.

fSignificant differences were assumed at P < 0.05.