Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 27.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Inorg Chem. 2017 Feb 15;2017(12):1687–1694. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201601450

Table 3.

Cytotoxicity IC50 Values for 2-(2-Pyridyl)Benzazole Ligands and Ru Complexes in the HL60 Cancer Cell Line

Comp. Coligand Y Dark IC50 [μM] Lighta IC50 [μM] PI
1 CH >100 n.d.b n.d.
2 NH >100 n.d. n.d.
3 O >100 n.d. n.d.
4 S >100 n.d. n.d.
5 dmphen CH 0.34 (±0.008) 0.034 (±0.001) 10
6 dmphen NH 2.79 (±0.31) 4.49 (±0.07) 0.6c
7 dmphen O 4.54 (±1.37) 3.43 (±0.75) 1.3
8 dmphen S 1.55 (±0.41) 4.55 (±1.73) 0.3c
9 bpy CH 1.24 (±0.008) 0.18 (±0.001) 7.3
10 bpy NH 44.8 (±0.4) 0.20 (±0.017) 224
11 bpy O 63.5 (±8.3) 5.18 (±0.047) 12.2
12 bpy S 83.3 (±1.2) 0.94 (±0.09) 88
Cisplatin 3.1 (±0.2) 3.1 (±0.2) 1
a

Using the Loctite Indigo LED array (light dose of 29.1 J/cm2)

b

n.d. – not determined.

c

The PI values reflect differences in the slopes of the dose response curves, and likely indicate that different cytotoxicity mechanisms are responsible for cell death in the dark vs. light conditions.