Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188156. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188156

Table 8. Benefits of the One Health scenario quantified as averted costs of potential human cases of West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease (WNND) associated to infected blood component transfusion.

Best-case, intermediate, and worst-case scenario according to the probability of WNND transfusion associated transmission. Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 2009–2015.

Best-case scenario Intermediate scenario Worst-case scenario
Short term cost of hospitalization avoided (Euro) 0 30,792 277,128
Compensation for transfusion-associated disease avoided (Euro) 0 300,000 2,700,000
Total benefit of the One Health scenario (Euro) 0 330,792 2,977,128

WNND: West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease

Benefits of the One Health scenario are estimated as potential transfusion associated West Nile virus neuroinvasive disease (WNND) cases avoided. Three scenarios are considered based on the assumed probability of developing WNND after receiving an infected blood transfusion. This probability was assumed to be 0%, 10%, and 100% in the best-case, intermediate, and worst-case scenario, resulting in 0, 2, and 18 potential WNND cases avoided, respectively.