Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 27;12(11):e0188498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188498

Table 2. Summary of taxi drivers’ exposures under different test conditions (geometric mean, interquartile range, and percentage of change from NM).

Mitigation NMa WCb WC+HECAc
On-road PM2.5 (μg/m3) 31 (20, 53) 28 (20, 40) (-10%)d 29 (24, 33) (-6%)
In-cabin PM2.5 (μg/m3) 19 (15, 22) 20 (16, 20) (5%) 12 (10, 16) * (-37%)
On-road UFP
(x104 cm-3)
2.71 (2.44, 3.02) 2.72 (2.29, 3.46) (0%) 2.70 (2.34, 3.55) (-0%)
In-cabin UFP
(x104 cm-3)
1.40 (1.13, 1.97) 1.33 (1.07, 1.77) (-5%) 0.74 (0.59, 1.02) * (-47%)
∑OH-NAPtrap
(μg/g cr)
4.69 (2.30, 8.96) 3.47 (1.99, 5.38) (-26%) 4.40 (2.50, 6.47) (-6%)
∑OH-FLUtrap
(μg/g cr)
0.51 (0.29, 0.71) 0.40 (0.30, 0.74) (-22%) 0.48 (0.33, 0.60) (-6%)
∑OH-PHEtrap
(μg/g cr)
0.15 (0.08, 0.24) 0.12 (0.07, 0.20) (-20%) 0.18 (0.14, 0.20) (20%)
1-OH-PYRtrap
(μg/g cr)
0.05 (0.02, 0.10) 0.05 (0.02, 0.10) (0%) 0.07 (0.05, 0.10) (40%)
Pre-test MDA
(μg/g cr)
20.80 (20.53, 54.18) 10.74 (9.23, 40.95) (-48%) 27.14 (13.49, 56.39) (30%)
Post-test MDA
(μg/g cr)
31.91 (22.78, 47.25) 31.73 (22.87, 43.90) (-1%) 23.68 (9.99, 55.37) (-17%)

a. No mitigation

b. Window closed

c. High efficiency cabin air filter

d. Numbers in parenthesis indicate percentage of change from NM.

* indicate significance of paired t-test (p < 0.05) compared with NM.