Table 3.
Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | AUC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance | |||||
Training Set | PCIS | 0.631 | 0.742 | 0.726 | 0.723 |
HFMD-RF | 0.807 | 0.969 | 0.945 | 0.919 | |
Test Set | PCIS | 0.670 | 0.753 | 0.741 | 0.768 |
HFMD-RF | 0.824 | 0.931 | 0.916 | 0.916 | |
Sensitivity (improvement, P value) | Specificity (improvement, P value) | Accuracy (improvement, P value) | AUC (improvement, P value) | ||
Performance comparison | |||||
Training Set | HFMD-RF against PCIS | 27.9%, P < 0.001 | 30.6%, P < 0.001 | 30.2%, P < 0.001 | 26.8%, P < 0.001 |
Test Set | HFMD-RF against PCIS | 21.3%, P = 0.017 | 25.2%, P < 0.001 | 24.7%, P < 0.001 | 18.8%, P < 0.001 |
The Chi-square test was used for comparison of Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy, and the two-sample t test for AUC between HFMD-RF and PCIS.