Table 5.
Logistic regression results for agreement with reasons to hunt.
| Variable | Respondent Finds the Following Reason Acceptable to Hunt: | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food | Trophy | |||
| Coefficient (SE) | Marginal Effect (SE) | Coefficient (SE) | Marginal Effect (SE) | |
| Under 45 | −0.2827 (0.2190) |
−0.0282 (0.0219) |
−0.0003 (0.1560) |
−0.0000 (0.0360) |
| Male | 0.1431 (0.2153) |
0.0141 (0.0213) |
0.4011 *** (0.1520) |
0.0924 (0.0348) |
| College Graduate | 0.1562 (0.2392) |
0.0159 (0.0251) |
−0.1687 (0.1730) |
−0.0393 (0.0407) |
| Pet | −0.1592 (0.2273) |
−0.0155 (0.0217) |
−0.3304 ** (0.1631) |
−0.0770 (0.0383) |
| Visited a Livestock Operation | −0.0515 (0.2510) |
−0.0051 (0.0248) |
0.2952 * (0.1759) |
0.0678 (0.0402) |
| Visited a Fair | 0.6558 *** (0.2467) |
0.0649 (0.0242) |
0.0481 (0.1868) |
0.0111 (0.0431) |
| Respondent hunts | 10.235 ** (0.5412) |
0.0886 (0.0255) |
0.7746 *** (0.2226) |
0.1873 (0.0550) |
| Respondent doesn’t know any hunters. | −0.6997 *** (0.2298) |
−0.0752 (0.0266) |
−0.3275 * (0.1744) |
−0.0744 (0.0389) |
| constant | 10.788 (0.3479) |
−0.6079 (0.2521) |
||
|
Log Likelihood Prob > Chi2 Pseudo R2 n |
−3000.656 0.0000 0.0665 825 |
−5200.335 0.0000 0.0407 825 |
||
Note 1: For all variables the marginal effect is for discrete change of dummy variable from 0 to 1. Note 2: p-values: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01.