Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 28;17:219. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8

Table 2.

Characteristics of studies included in this meta-analysis

Study year country Study type Group NO. Of eyes Age(yr) Duration of symptoms (days) Axial length (mm) Dye for ILM stained Tamponade agents
Matsumura [22] 2016 Japan Retro ILM peeling 12 75.30 ± 8.70 NR 30.40 ± 1.60 brilliant blue G C3F8/SF6/Silicone oil
ILM flap 10 67.70 ± 9.70 NR 28.40 ± 2.20 brilliant blue G C3F8/SF6/Silicone oil
Baba et al [23] 2017 Japan Retro ILM peeling 11 69.75 ± 91.70 NR 30.17 ± 1.68 brilliant blue G C3F8
ILM flap 10 73.00 ± 96.67 NR 28.98 ± 1.31 brilliant blue G C3F8
Sasaki et al [24] 2017 Japan Retro ILM peeling 9 66.00 ± 12.5 79.1 ± 66.5 31.10 ± 1.95 brilliant blue G C3F8
ILM flap 6 75.00 ± 6.40 47.6 ± 40.6 30.47 ± 2.57 brilliant blue G C3F8
Chen et al [25] 2016 Taiwan Retro ILM peeling 20 60.53 ± 8.78 161.60 ± 136.2 29.35 ± 1.88 ICG C3F8
ILM flap 20 62.06 ± 8.90 587.0 ± 1032.53 28.40 ± 1.94 ICG C3F8