Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Microbiol. 2016 Dec 12;2:16238. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.238

Lactate signalling regulates fungal β-glucan masking and immune evasion

Elizabeth R Ballou 1, Gabriela M Avelar 1, Delma S Childers 1, Joanna Mackie 1, Judith M Bain 1, Jeanette Wagener 1, Stavroula L Kastora 1, Mirela D Panea 1, Sarah E Hardison 1, Louise A Walker 1, Lars P Erwig 1, Carol A Munro 1, Neil AR Gow 1, Gordon D Brown 1, Donna M MacCallum 1, Alistair JP Brown 1,*
PMCID: PMC5704895  EMSID: EMS75053  PMID: 27941860

Summary Paragraph

As they proliferate, fungi expose antigens at their cell surface that are potent stimulators of the innate immune response, and yet the commensal fungus Candida albicans is able to colonize immuno-competent individuals. We show that C. albicans may evade immune detection by presenting a moving immunological target. We report that the exposure of β-glucan, a key Pathogen Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) located at the cell surface of C. albicans and other pathogenic Candida species, is modulated in response to changes in carbon source. Exposure to lactate induces β-glucan masking in C. albicans via a signaling pathway that has recruited an evolutionarily conserved receptor (Gpr1) and transcriptional factor (Crz1) from other well-characterized pathways. In response to lactate, these regulators control the expression of cell wall related genes that contribute to β-glucan masking. This represents the first description of active PAMP masking by a Candida species, a process that reduces the visibility of the fungus to the immune system.

Keywords: Candida albicans, lactate sensing, signal transduction, PAMP masking, immune evasion, fungal pathogenicity, RNA sequencing


Vertebrates recognize microbial pathogens via immunological synapses between host Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) and the corresponding Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs)1. Many PAMPs lie at the cell surface, the first point of contact with the host. The fungal cell wall is a matrix of α- and β-mannans, phosphomannans, β-glucan, and chitin, each of which exerts immuno-modulatory effects1. β-1,3-glucan, an essential component of most fungal cell walls, is a ligand for the C-type lectin receptor Dectin-11. β-glucan recognition by Dectin-1 triggers phagocytosis and killing by neutrophils and macrophages2. Some fungi have evolved strategies to prevent this interaction. For example, Cryptococcus neoformans expresses an anti-inflammatory polysaccharide capsule that masks β-glucan3. The RodA hydrophobin masks β-glucans at the Aspergillus fumigatus spore surface4. We show that pathogenic Candida species actively mask surface β-glucan in response to the host metabolite lactate, thereby attenuating the recognition of Candida albicans by host phagocytes.

C. albicans possesses an elastic cell wall in which β-glucan is generally buried below an outer fibrillar layer of mannan, within an inner matrix of cross-linked glucan and chitin5. However, β-glucan becomes exposed at bud growth sites, during yeast-hypha morphogenesis, exposure to antifungal drugs, and within biofilms69. Moreover, β-glucan exposure increases during systemic infection7, in a remodeling process partly mediated by host cell antifungal activity10. Indeed, the C. albicans cell wall undergoes significant remodeling in response to host-derived inputs including changes in carbon source, oxygen levels and iron availability11,12, or after in vitro exposure to antifungal drugs7.

Specific signaling pathways mediate C. albicans cell wall remodeling in response to genetic perturbation or antifungal drug treatments7. These include the Mkc1 cell integrity pathway, the Hog1 stress response pathway, the Cek1 pathway, and Ca++-calcineurin (Cna1) signaling1315. However, the signaling pathways that drive cell wall remodeling in response to nutritional signals remain obscure.

Changes in carbon source lead to alterations in cell wall structure, affect immune surveillance and enhance the virulence of C. albicans12,16. The carbon sources available to support fungal growth and colonization differ between host niches. Some contain glucose (e.g. blood), some lack glucose (e.g. the colon), while others contain significant concentrations of carboxylic acids such as lactate (e.g. the vagina and colon)17,18. Here we define the mechanisms by which carbon source affects β-glucan exposure and immune surveillance. We show that C. albicans exploits conserved signaling elements to actively mask this major PAMP in response to the physiologically relevant carboxylic acid L-lactate. Furthermore, we show that this phenomenon is conserved in other pathogenic Candida species.

Lactate triggers β-glucan masking in pathogenic Candida species

The architecture of the C. albicans cell wall changes significantly with carbon source: cells grown on lactate possess thinner, less elastic cell walls compared to glucose-grown cells12,19. Although the proportion of β-glucan relative to mannan and chitin remains similar12, we reasoned that β-glucan organization and exposure at the C. albicans cell surface might be affected by carbon source. To test this, cells were stained with Fc-Dectin-1, and median fluorescence intensity (MFI) was quantified by flow cytometry. Glucose-grown cells displayed a biphasic distribution of β-glucan exposure (Figures 1ai). The low exposure population generally contained small cells, whereas larger cells demonstrated higher levels of β-glucan exposure, consistent with previously described mothers with bud scars7,9. In contrast, lactate-grown cells displayed a monophasic population of smaller, proliferating mother and daughter cells (Figures 1ai). Glucose-grown cells reproducibly displayed higher levels of β-glucan exposure than lactate-grown cells. Significantly, cells grown on a mixture of glucose plus lactate, which were similar in size to glucose-grown cells, exhibited reduced levels of β-glucan exposure, equivalent to lactate-grown cells (Figures 1b, Supplementary Figure 1a). Therefore, lactate triggers β-glucan masking even in the presence of glucose. (We defined β-glucan masking as a ≥50% reduction in MFI.) These changes in β-glucan exposure are carbon source-dependent, not pH-dependent (Supplementary Figure 1b). β-glucan masking is retained over long periods (Supplementary Figure 1c), but is reversible (Supplementary Figure 1d): β-glucan exposure increased within 1 hour (<1 generation) of transferring lactate-grown cells to glucose, whilst β-glucan masking occurred within 6 hours of adding lactate to glucose-grown cells and was retained throughout 72 hours growth on lactate (~51 generations).

Figure 1. Lactate activates β-glucan masking in Candida an attenuates phagocytic response.

Figure 1

(a) Flow cytometry analysis of β-glucan exposure. Wild-type Candida albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. lusitaniae, C. parapsilosis, C. glabrata, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were grown in glucose or lactate and examined for β-glucan masking. The plots and Median Fluorescence Intensities (MFI) are shown for glucose-grown cells (red; MFI value in top right of each panel) and lactate-grown cells (blue; MFI value, top left). β-glucan masking was defined as a >50% decrease in MFI. Plots are representative of data collected in two independent replicate experiments. (b) β-glucan exposure for C. albicans cells grown in glucose (red) or glucose + lactate (purple). (c) Percentage of glucose- or lactate-grown C. albicans cells phagocytosed by murine BMD-macrophages; n=4 donor mice; measurements were performed in triplicate per mouse per condition and analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test; errors bars = 95%CI. (d) Percentage of neutrophils recruited to the site of injection in BALB/c mice intraperitoneally infected with wild-type C. albicans pre-grown on glucose or lactate. For each group, n=6 mice; data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test; error bars = 95%CI. (e) TNF-α and (f) MIP1α responses from human M1-activated monocyte-derived macrophages to glucose- and lactate-grown cells; n=4 donors were exposed to triplicate independent samples of Candida cells for each condition; the data were analyzed using Friedman test for matched non-parametric data; error bars = 95%CI.

This lactate-induced β-glucan masking phenotype was observed in almost all C. albicans clinical isolates examined (Supplementary Figure 2). (The molecular basis for the single exception, Clade 4 strain S20175.016, is discussed below). These blood, oral, vaginal, nail, and animal isolates were from eight epidemiological clades20. Other pathogenic yeasts in the CTG clade including C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. lusitaniae, C. parapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis displayed lactate-induced β-glucan masking (Figure 1aii-iv). Candida glabrata is more closely related to S. cerevisiae than to the other Candida species, yet masking was observed for C. glabrata but not S. cerevisiae (Figure 1av,vi). Therefore, many pathogenic Candida species display lactate-dependent masking, suggesting that this phenotype might promote immune evasion, and hence a pathogenic lifestyle.

Growth of C. albicans on lactate reduces phagocytic recruitment

Lactate-grown C. albicans cells stimulate less IL-17 production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), and are phagocytosed less efficiently by J774.1 macrophages than glucose-grown cells16. We recapitulated these observations with murine bone marrow-derived macrophages and also demonstrated that lactate attenuates neutrophil recruitment during infection in vivo (Figures 1c,d). Lactate-grown cells recruited fewer neutrophils to the intraperitoneal space than glucose-grown cells (p=0.0022) (Figure 1d). No difference was observed in the total number of CD45+ immune cells collected (p=0.94), but the recruitment of (CD11b+ Ly6Chigh) inflammatory monocytes was increased (Figure S3a). Furthermore, lactate-grown cells stimulated less TNFα (p=0.0005) and less MIP1α (p<0.0001) from human M1-activated monocyte-derived macrophages than glucose-grown cells (Figures 1e,f, Supplementary Figure 3b,c). Therefore, lactate-grown C. albicans cells stimulate altered immune responses compared to glucose-grown cells. This is consistent with our observation that lactate-grown cells are more virulent than glucose-grown cells in a murine model of systemic candidiasis12.

β-glucan masking does not depend on lactate metabolism

Lactate exists as two isomers, D- and L-lactate. C. albicans does not metabolize D-lactate, but assimilates L-lactate, the form generated by the host. Gastrointestinal microbiota secrete D- and L-lactate. The above work used a racemic mixture of D/L-lactate (1:1), and therefore we tested each enantiomer separately. β-glucan masking was triggered by L-lactate, but not by its D-isomer (Figure 2a). Furthermore, β-glucan masking was activated by spent culture medium from macrophages (L-Lactate) or the gut bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri, (D- and L-Lactate) (Figure 2b). Therefore, β-glucan masking is triggered by the lactate isomer of physiological relevance to both host niches and the gut microbiota.

Figure 2. Lactate-induced β-glucan masking is specific, physiologically relevant, and mediated by Gpr1.

Figure 2

(a) β-glucan exposure for wild-type C. albicans cells grown in glucose (red), and glucose plus 2% D-lactate (blue, top panel) or glucose plus 2% L-lactate (blue, bottom panel). Median Fluorescence Intensities (MFI) are indicated at the top of each panel, the value for glucose on the right, and for lactate on the left. Plots are representative of three independent replicate experiments. (b) β-glucan exposure for C. albicans cells incubated for 6 h in fresh (red; MFI right) or spent (blue; MFI left) culture medium from J774.1 macrophages (36 h, top panel) or Lactobacillus reuteri (overnight culture, bottom panel). Plots are representative of two independent replicate experiments. (c) β-glucan exposure in C. albicans cells grown on glucose (red; MFI, top right) or lactate (blue; MFI, top left) for gpr1Δ gpa2Δ cells (top); GPR1 GPA2 wild-type cells (bottom); gpr1Δ cells (top); GPR1 wild-type cells (bottom); clinical isolate S20175.016 containing pACT1-GPR1-GFP (top); S20175.016 containing the control pACT1-GFP vector (bottom). Plots are representative of data collected in three independent replicate experiments. (d) Micrographs showing Gpr1-GFP internalization in C. albicans wild-type cells (SC5314) expressing Gpr1-GFP following 1 hr exposure to glucose, lactate, or methionine at the indicated concentration Micrographs are representative of three replicate experiments: scale bar = 10 μm. (e) Gpr1-GFP localization after 1 hr of exposure to 100 mM of the indicated ligand. Micrographs are representative of three replicate experiments: scale bar = 10 μm. (f) Dose response curves showing β-glucan exposure for C. albicans cells grown for 4 hours in buffered YNB plus the indicated ligand at 2 mM (lactate only), 10 mM, 100 mM, or 150 mM. Values were normalized against 0 mM for each condition: n=3; error bars = 95%CI. (g,h) Mannan (ConA, red) and β-glucan (Fc-Dectin1, green) exposure for (g) wild-type and (h) gpr1Δ gpa2Δ cells. Micrographs are representative of two replicate experiments: scale bar = 5 μm.

We tested whether lactate metabolism is essential for β-glucan masking. In C. albicans lactate assimilation depends on uptake via the Jen1/2 transporters21 and the glyoxylate cycle enzyme isocitrate lyase (Icl1)17. Lactate-induced β-glucan masking persisted in icl1Δ single and jen1Δ jen2Δ double mutants (Supplementary Figure 4). Therefore, β-glucan masking is not dependent on lactate metabolism.

Gpr1 is a lactate sensor in C. albicans

Lactate sensors have been described in mammals and fish. For example, lactate stimulates lipolysis in mammalian adipocytes via the G-protein coupled receptor GPR81, and key lactate binding residues have been defined22. We identified Gpr1 as the closest C. albicans orthologue of human GPR81. In C. albicans, Gpr1 and its Gα protein Gpa2 activate cAMP signaling to promote yeast-hypha morphogenesis and virulence23. In S. cerevisiae, the Gpr1 ligand is glucose, and its glucose binding site has been defined experimentally24. The ligand binding regions from ScGpr1 and CaGpr1 diverge at key residues (Supplementary Figure 5), consistent with a change in ligand specificity. Indeed, methionine, rather than glucose, has been proposed as the CaGpr1 ligand23.

Given the structural relatedness between L-lactate and L-methionine (Supplementary Figure 5), we tested whether Gpr1 mediates lactate-induced β-glucan masking. Masking was lost in the gpr1Δ gpa2Δ double mutant (Figure 2c), significantly attenuated in gpr1Δ cells and partially attenuated in gpa2Δ cells relative to their CAI4 parent (Figure 2c, Supplementary Figure 6a,c), indicating that this phenotype is dependent on Gpr1 and partially on its G-alpha protein Gpa2. As described above, C. albicans S20175.016 did not display lactate-induced β-glucan masking (Supplementary Figure 2). Sequencing of both GPR1 alleles from this strain revealed non-synonymous SNPs relative to GPR1 from SC5314. Transforming GPR1 from SC5314 into S20175.016 was sufficient to restore lactate-induced β-glucan masking (Figure 2c), confirming that Gpr1 is required for this phenotype.

We examined the impact of lactate on the localization of Gpr1-GFP in C. albicans. Gpr1-GFP localizes to the cell surface in C. albicans grown on minimal medium containing glucose23. In our hands, Gpr1-GFP localized to the cell surface and vesicles under these conditions (Figure 2di), suggesting dynamic cycling of this receptor. Following lactate addition, Gpr1-GFP was internalized (Figure 2div-vi). Methionine also triggers Gpr1-GFP internalization23. We recapitulated this response, but only at non-physiological concentrations (100mM), and methionine did not activate β-glucan masking (Figure 2diii,d). Pyruvate promoted partial masking, which was lost in the gpr1Δ gpa2Δ background (Figure 2f, Supplementary Figure 6b). Neither proline nor acetate triggered β-glucan masking, or promoted Gpr1-GFP internalization (Figure 2e,f). In contrast, lactate consistently stimulated robust Gpr1-GFP internalization and β-glucan masking at low concentrations (2mM, 10mM: Figure 2div,v) in a Gpr1-Gpa2-dependent manner (Supplementary Figure 6b). These data highlight the specificity of Gpr1-dependent lactate-induced masking.

Lactate-induced β-glucan masking does not depend on cAMP signaling

C. albicans Gpr1 and Gpa2 act upstream of the cAMP pathway to activate yeast-hypha morphogenesis23. Therefore, we examined lactate-induced β-glucan masking in C. albicans cyr1Δ cells lacking adenylyl cyclase that are defective in cAMP signaling and display cell wall defects. These cells exhibited abnormally high β-glucan exposure (Supplementary Figure 7a). However, lactate still induced β-glucan masking (Supplementary Figure 7a). Likewise, β-glucan masking persisted in pde2Δ cells lacking the inhibitory cyclic phosphodiesterase (Supplementary Figure 7a). Furthermore, exogenous cAMP did not influence β-glucan masking (Supplementary Figure 7a). We conclude that, despite the involvement of Gpr1, lactate-induced β-glucan masking is not mediated by cAMP signaling.

These data suggest that Gpr1 plays dual roles in morphogenetic regulation23 and lactate-induced β-glucan masking (Figure 2). In other systems G-protein coupled receptor specificity is mediated by ligand-specific interaction with G-alpha subunits25. We therefore investigated the role of the second G-alpha subunit, Cag1. A cag1Δ strain exhibited constitutive β-glucan masking (Supplementary Figure 6a,c), suggesting that Cag1 plays an inhibitory role in this process. Therefore, Cag1 and Gpa2 may modulate the specificity of Gpr1 signaling to the β-glucan masking and cAMP pathways via mechanisms that remain to be defined.

We further tested whether key morphogenetic signaling pathways mediate lactate-induced β-glucan masking. Cells lacking Efg1 and Cph1, which regulate hyphal development and are targets of cAMP and MAPK signaling, respectively, displayed normal lactate-induced β-glucan masking (Supplementary Figure 7b). Furthermore, inactivation of Cek1, an ERK-family protein kinase that regulates Cph1 and influences cell wall structure and β-glucan15, did not perturb masking (Supplementary Figure 7c). Nor was masking affected in cla4Δ or cst20Δ cells (Supplementary Figure 7d,e), which lack Ste20p-like kinases for Cek1-Cph1 signaling26. Therefore, lactate-induced β-glucan masking is not dependent on morphogenetic signaling via the MAPK or cAMP pathways.

A Crz1-dependent pathway triggers lactate-induced β-glucan masking

To identify regulators of lactate-induced β-glucan masking, we examined transcription factors known to influence cell wall organization. This revealed the involvement of Crz1, which regulates membrane integrity, antifungal drug tolerance, and cell wall remodeling13,27. Lactate-induced β-glucan masking was blocked in C. albicans crz1Δ cells, and this defect was suppressed by CRZ1 reintegration (Figure 3a).

Figure 3. Lactate-induced β-glucan masking is dependent on Crz1, but not calcineurin.

Figure 3

(a) Cytometric analysis of β-glucan exposure in C. albicans cells grown on glucose (red) or glucose plus lactate (blue): CRZ1 wild-type; crz1Δ mutant; crz1Δ + CRZ1 reconstituted strain; cna1Δ; cnb1Δ; wild-type cells exposed to 3.12 μg/ml FK506. Median Fluorescence Intensities (MFI) are indicated at the top of each panel, the value for glucose on the right, and for lactate or FK506 on the left. Plots are representative of data collected in three independent replicate experiments. (b) Micrographs showing the localization of GFP-Crz1 in wild-type (CAI4+CIp10), cnb1Δ, and gpr1Δ gpa2Δ cells grown in or glucose alone (control), glucose and exposed to 100 μM CaCl2 (1 h), or glucose plus 2% lactate (4 h). Micrographs are representative of three replicate experiments: scale bar = 5 μm. (c) Micrographs showing mannan (ConA, red) and β-glucan (Fc-Dectin1, green) exposure in wild-type and crz1Δ cells following growth in glucose or glucose plus lactate. Micrographs are representative of two replicate experiments: scale bar = 5 μm.

In C. albicans, Crz1 is activated by the calcineurin pathway in response to calcium and cell wall stress. Under these conditions, calcineurin signaling is blocked by deletion of CNA1 (encoding the catalytic subunit of calcineurin) or CNB1 (encoding the regulatory subunit), or by pharmacological inhibition of calcineurin by FK50628. However, lactate-induced β-glucan masking was not perturbed in cna1Δ or cnb1Δ cells or in wild-type cells treated with FK506 (Figure 3a), suggesting that lactate-dependent Crz1 activation is not mediated via calcineurin.

Calcineurin controls Crz1 localization in response to calcium28. In C. albicans, Ca2+ triggers calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation of Crz1, leading to its nuclear accumulation28. We recapitulated this observation (Figure 3b) and observed that lactate also triggers nuclear accumulation of GFP-Crz1 (Figure 3b). Significantly, the nuclear accumulation of GFP-Crz1 was reduced in gpr1Δ gpa2Δ cells in response to lactate, but not in response to calcium (Figure 3b). In contrast, loss of CNB1 prevented GFP-Crz1 nuclear accumulation in response to calcium, but not in response to lactate (Figure 3b). We conclude that Crz1 is activated by alternative signaling pathways depending on the nature of the input signal. Whilst Crz1 is activated via calcineurin in response to calcium28, the response to lactate is mediated via Gpr1. This signaling is not dependent on the protein kinase C cell integrity pathway (Supplementary Figure 8).

Lactate-dependent targets of Crz1 include cell wall functions

We performed genome-wide transcriptional profiling to identify genes that might contribute to lactate-induced β-glucan masking in C. albicans and investigate the impact of the Crz1 transcription factor. Using RNA sequencing, we compared glucose alone and glucose plus lactate cells, which grow at similar rates (Supplementary Table 1). The 157 lactate-regulated genes we identified were significantly enriched (p<10-5) in functions related to the plasma membrane, cell surface, and cell periphery, consistent with the changes in cell wall β-glucan exposure (Supplementary Table 2). Furthermore, the regulation of two-thirds of these 157 genes was compromised by CRZ1 inactivation, suggesting that they are either direct or indirect targets of Crz1 (Supplementary Table 1). ACE2, a transcription factor regulating cell wall integrity, protein mannosylation and chitin synthesis29, was induced in crz1Δ cells exposed to lactate. Also, we identified overlaps between Ace2 targets identified by ChIPSeq30 and the genes highlighted by our RNA sequencing (Supplementary Table 3). Therefore, the influence of ACE2 on lactate-induced β-glucan masking was tested. We examined ace2Δ cells by confocal and fluorescence microscopy because their aggregation, due to a severe cytokinesis defect29, precludes flow cytometry. The ace2Δ cells displayed high levels of β-glucan exposure in the presence of lactate (Figure 4a,b), indicating a block in masking. This suggests the involvement of a Crz1-Ace2 network in lactate-induced β-glucan masking (Figure 5, Supplementary Table 3).

Figure 4. Role of lactate-regulated genes in lactate-dependent β-glucan masking.

Figure 4

(a) Fluorescent micrographs for wild-type (CAI4), mnn14Δ, mnn22Δ, exg2Δ, cht2Δ, pga26Δ, and aceΔ cells stained for chitin (Calcofluor White, blue) and β-glucan (Fc-Dectin1, green). Micrographs are representative of two replicate experiments: scale bar = 5 μm. (b) Confocal 3D rendered micrographs showing mannan (ConA, blue) and β-glucan (Fc-Dectin1, green) exposure in wild-type (SC5314) and ace2Δ cells. Micrographs are representative of two replicate experiments: scale bar = 5 μm. (c) β-glucan exposure for C. albicans wild-type parent (CAI4), exg2Δ, cht2Δ, mnn14Δ cells grown on glucose (red) or glucose plus lactate (blue). Median Fluorescence Intensities (MFI) are indicated at the top of each panel, the value for glucose on the right, and for lactate on the left. Data were acquired using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer. Plots are representative of data collected in two independent replicate experiments. (d) β-glucan exposure for MNN22 parent, mnn22Δ, PGA26 parent and pga26Δ cells grown on glucose (red) or glucose plus lactate (blue). Median Fluorescence Intensities (MFI) are indicated at the top of each panel, the value for glucose on the right, and for lactate on the left. Data were acquired using a BD Fortessa flow cytometer. Plots are representative of data collected in two independent replicate experiments.

Figure 5. Regulation of β-glucan masking in C. albicans.

Figure 5

(a) A Crz1 network contributes to lactate-induced gene regulation. Differentially regulated genes are displayed as nodes and classified as either cell wall related (blue) or other (grey), based on their GO annotation. Lactate- and Crz1-regulated clusters are based on the RNA sequencing dataset, and the Ace2 cluster represents genes bound at their promoters by Ace230. The data used to generate this network in Cytoscape 3.2.1 are presented in Supplementary Table S3. A core set of six genes are regulated by lactate, Crz1 and Ace2, and three of these execute cell wall or cell surface-related functions (MNN22, FET3, HGT10). (b) Model of β-glucan masking in C. albicans. L-lactate is detected by Gpr1, which in turn signals to Crz1 in a calcineurin independent manner. With the help of Ace2, Crz1 regulates a polygenic response resulting in masking of β-glucan on the C. albicans cell surface.

We tested whether lactate-regulated cell wall genes influence lactate-induced β-glucan masking, reasoning that the outer mannan layer might contribute to masking31,32 (Figure 4a, b). Mnn14Δ cells did exhibit a partial masking defect (26.2% decrease in MFI; we define masking as a >50% decrease) (Figure 4a). However, mnn22Δ and exg2Δ cells retained the masking phenotype (Figure 4a,b), and although the levels of β-glucan exposure were elevated for cht2Δ and pga26Δ, lactate still triggered masking (Figure 4a, b). Also, our microscopic analyses of wild-type, gpr1Δ gpa2Δ and crz1Δ cells did not reveal a simple inverse relationship between mannan distribution and β-glucan exposure at the cell surface (Figure 2g,h, 3c). Therefore major changes in mannan distribution do not appear to account for lactate-induced β-glucan masking. We tested whether key cell wall crosslinking enzymes are required for this phenotype by examining a triple crh11Δ crh12Δ utr2Δ mutant that lacks three cell wall glycosidases. These cells displayed a gross increase in glucan exposure, but retained some degree of β-glucan masking (Supplementary Figure 9), suggesting that Crh11, Crh12 and Utr2 are not essential for masking.

Discussion

We show that L-lactate, generated by host cells or bacteria in the host’s microbiota, actively triggers masking of a major PAMP at the fungal cell surface (Figure 1). This lactate-induced β-glucan masking phenotype, which is observed in a range of pathogenic Candida species (Figure 1), is triggered by physiologically relevant concentrations of lactate and is not activated by other host-derived metabolites such as acetate, methionine, or proline (Figure 2). This PAMP masking correlates with reduced uptake of C. albicans cells by macrophages in vitro, decreased stimulation of TNFα and MIP1α by human macrophages, and diminished recruitment of neutrophils in vivo (Figure 1).

Carbon source-mediated immune evasion is likely to be significant in the context of host colonization because C. albicans cells adapt rapidly to the mixtures of carbon sources offered by host niches (Figure 2, Supplementary Figure 1)17. Lactate levels can reach 2-4 mM in blood and vaginal secretions, and can comprise approximately 2% of all carbon metabolites generated by the gut microbiota33. Glucose is essentially absent from the colon, present at 3–5 mM in the blood, and at concentrations of up to 20 mM in vaginal secretions11,18,34. Although changes in additional PAMPs may contribute to the effects of carbon source, the importance of fungal β-glucan exposure and Dectin-1-mediated fungal recognition is widely recognized3538. Taken together, the data indicate that changes in PAMP exposure occur as the fungus adapts to local nutrients within host niches, and this affects the visibility of the colonising fungus to host immune defences. This idea is consistent with the observations that β-glucan exposure changes during the progression of systemic candidiasis7,9, that C. albicans adaptation affects immune recognition by Dectin-1 during systemic candidiasis20, and that changes in carbon source alter the virulence of C. albicans12.

How does lactate trigger β-glucan masking? We show that lactate triggers a signaling pathway that has co-opted the Gpr1 G-protein coupled receptor and the Crz1 transcription factor from the cAMP and calcineurin signaling pathways, respectively (Figures 2 and 3). Maiden et al. showed that the Gpr1-Gpa2 module triggers filamentation in response to amino acid signals in a cAMP independent fashion23. We hypothesize that a parallel pathway involving Gpr1, and possibly Gpa2, mediates lactate signaling to Crz1. This pathway does not require calcineurin, which is reminiscent of undefined calcineurin-independent modes of Crz1 regulation in other fungi39,40. Crz1 then appears to regulate the expression of targets including ACE2 (Table S1), the inactivation of which affects lactate-induced β-glucan masking (Figure 4). Deletion of ACE2 also leads to β-glucan exposure at the S. cerevisiae cell surface6. In C. albicans, Crz1 regulates additional cell wall genes that may collectively mediate β-glucan masking (Figures 4,5, Supplementary Table 1). However, individual cell wall mutations did not block this phenotype. Taken together these observations support the view that PAMP masking is a polygenic trait that is influenced by cumulative changes in the quantity, crosslinking and organization of multiple cell wall macromolecules6, and that the expression of these traits is modulated by lactate-Gpr1-Crz1 signaling (Figure 5).

How is β-glucan masked at the cell surface? β-glucan is generally buried below the outer fibrillar layer of the C. albicans cell wall, and is therefore masked by mannans. Mutations that compromise the mannan outer layer or glucan cross-linking cause β-glucan exposure at the cell surface (Figure 4). Mannan attachment to the inner glucan-chitin layer is dependent on cell wall remodeling enzymes whose expression is affected by growth on different carbon sources41. Therefore, mannans play a general role in β-glucan masking and may contribute to lactate-induced masking. However, mutants with defects in individual cell wall genes are still capable of lactate-induced masking, suggesting that β-glucan masking is dependent on overall changes in cell wall architecture.

In conclusion, this study reveals that C. albicans actively masks a major PAMP in response to host-derived carbon sources, essentially turning C. albicans into a moving target for the immune system in response to host-specific signals. This type of immune evasion is likely significant for disease progression in the host during periods of anaerobic metabolism (when lactic acid production is high), in the gastrointestinal tract (where anaerobic bacteria generate high lactate concentrations), and in patients with diabetes, short-bowel syndrome or bacterial infection (when serum lactate concentrations become elevated). This precedent, where C. albicans exploits host cues to modulate its immune visibility, may apply to other fungal pathogens (Figure 1)42,43.

Methods

Strains and culture conditions

Strains used in this study are listed in Table S4. In all cases, WT indicates the prototrophic parent of a given mutant strain, with the exception of SN152, for which auxotrophy has been demonstrated to have no impact on fungal virulence44. C. albicans was routinely cultured on YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% bacto-peptone, 2% glucose, 2% bacto-agar) agar plates stored at room temperature. For glucose and lactate exposure, cells were incubated overnight at 30°C, 200 rpm in 5 mL YNB without amino acids (Sigma Y1250) prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions plus 2% glucose and/or 2% D/L-lactate (Sigma, L1375) as indicated. All auxotrophic strains were grown in media with appropriate supplements.

BMDM phagocytosis assay

All experiments were conducted by approval of the College of Life Sciences and Medicine Ethics Review Board, University of Aberdeen, and they all adhered to local and institutional policy requirements. C57BL/6 wild-type mice were bred and housed in the University of Aberdeen animal facility. Female mice aged 21 weeks were used to generate bone marrow derived macrophages (BMDM) by flushing femurs and tibia with RPMI 1640 GlutaMAX (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated foetal calf serum (FCS; Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK), 200 U ml-1 penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma), 10 mM HEPES (Sigma). Bone marrow cells were cultured for 7 days at 37°C with 5% CO2 in supplemented RPMI plus 15% (v/v) Lee’s conditioned medium. Following cell counts, 1.2 x 105 BMDM in 300μl supplemented RPMI medium were seeded into 8-well imaging slides (ibidi, Munich, Germany) to adhere overnight. Phagocytosis assays were performed by combining 3:1 thimerosal-fixed yeast:adhered macrophages as described previously45. Immediately prior to imaging, wells were replenished with fresh CO2-independent medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with FCS and glutamine (Sigma). Conditions were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 during 4h image acquisition at 1 minute intervals using an UltraVIEW® VoX spinning disk microscope (Nikon, Surrey, UK) with Volocity® software (Improvision, PerkinElmer, Coventry, UK). Triplicate movies were analysed for percent phagocytosis at 4 hours post inoculation for each condition with 4 independent experimental replicates conducted (a total of 200-300 macrophages combined with approx. 600-800 yeast per condition). Data were analysed by Mann-Whitney U test using GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Variance within the groups was not statistically different (F test to compare variances, p=0.1253).

Monocyte isolation, purification and macrophage differentiation

Blood from four healthy volunteers was collect according to the local guidelines and regulations, approved by the College Ethics Review Board of the University of Aberdeen and following informed consent of the donors (CERB/2012/11/676). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare) density centrifugation according to the manufactures instructions. Highly pure unlabelled monocytes were obtained from PBMCs by depletion of non-monocytes using a magnetically activated cell sorting (MACS) system together with a human pan-monocyte isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified monocytes were washed twice with PBS and cells were suspended in RPMI 1640 (Dutch modification) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 1% MEM non-essential amino acids (NEAA (100x), Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin and 50 ng/ml recombinant hGM-CSF (Gibco). Cells were seeded into cell culture dishes at a density of 1x106 cells/cm2, incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. On day 3 10ml fresh medium containing recombinant cytokines was added to the cultures. After 5 days cells were collected, seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 1x105 cells/well and left overnight to adhere. Macrophages were fully activated with 50 ng/ml IFN-g and 100 ng/ml LPS 24 hours prior to co-culture with formaldehyde fixed C. albicans yeast.

On the day of co-culture, macrophages were washed with PBS and fresh medium added. Then, C. albicans was pre-grown in YNB Glucose, Glucose + Lactate, or Lactate for 4 hours as described, fixed with 4% methanol-free formaldehyde (Thermo), and washed 3x with sterile 1xPBS (Sigma), was added to each well at an MOI of 5:1 macrophages. For each donor, PBS only wells were also included. At times 0, 6, and 24 hr post infection, 100 uL of supernatant was collected from each well and stored at -20. Cytokines and chemokines were quantified using the Luminex® Screening kit (R&D) and read on a BioPlex 200 System (Bio-Rad) according the manufacturer’s recommendations. Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism (v 7), and significance was determined using the Friedman test for matched non-parametric data. Bars represent 95% CI.

Neutrophil recruitment assay

BALB/c female mice (n=6/group, 8-12 weeks old, Harlan, UK) were injected intraperitoneally with 107 C. albicans (SC5314) pre-grown in either glucose or lactate and then resuspended in 100 μL sterile saline. Group size was determined from previous experiments as the minimum number of mice needed to detect statistical significance (p<0.05) with 90% power. Mice were randomly assigned to groups by an investigator not involved in the analysis and the fungal inocula were randomly allocated to groups. Mice were house in Individually Ventilated Cages (IVCs) and were provided with food and water ad libitum. Inocula were delivered in an unblinded fashion. After 4 h, mice were sacrifice using the schedule 1 method cervical dislocation. Immune infiltrates were collected by peritoneal lavage 46. Cells were labeled to distinguish neutrophils (CD45+, CD11b+, F4/80-, Ly6G+) and macrophages (CD45+, CD11b+, F4/80+, Ly6G-). Using flow cytometry, 10,000 cells were analysed for each mouse. Cells were analysed on a BD Fortessa flow cytometer, with automatic compensation protocols. Data represent percent neutrophils. Statistical analyses were performed using Graph Pad Prism (v 7), and significance was determined using Mann-Whitney U test. Bars represent 95% CI. Variance within the groups was not statistically different (F test to compare variances, p=0.1633). All animal experiments were performed under UK Home Office project license PPL 60/4135 granted to DMM in accordance with Home Office ethical guidelines. These experiments were performed by DMM, ERB, and SEH.

Quantification of β-glucan exposure in cell populations

Yeasts were grown in YNB + 2% glucose, + 2% glucose and 2% lactate, or 2% lactate overnight and inoculated into fresh medium for 4 hours. Cells were stained for β-glucan exposure using Fc-Dectin-1 47. Cells were counted by haemocytometer and 2.5 x 106 cells were washed with cold FACS buffer (1xPBS, 1% FCS, 0.5 mM EDTA). Cells were resuspended in 100 μL FACS buffer + 5 ng/μl Dectin-Fc and incubated in the dark on ice for 1 h. Cells were washed (5000 rpm, 3 min) twice in 100 μL FACS Buffer and resuspended in 100 μL FACS buffer plus 1:200 Gt F(ab')2 anti-Human IgG(gamma) conjugated to Alexafluor 488 (Invitrogen, cat. No. H10120) or Novex TRITC (Abcam, cat. No. A18822), for GFP-expressing cells. Cells were incubated in the dark on ice for 1 h and washed as above. Cells were fixed in 4% Formaldehyde (methanol- free), diluted in FACS Buffer, and stored on ice in the dark until analysis using either a FACS Calibur flow cytometer or BD Fortessa flow cytometer. For each experiment, 10,000 events were acquired for each sample. Fresh glucose-grown C. albicans SC5314 cells were used as a positive control for each run. As a secondary-only control, aliquots from all cells to be analysed were pooled, diluted to 2.5 x 106 cells, and treated as above except that no Dectin-Fc was added. Median Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) is reported for each sample as determined using FlowJo v 10 software. This measure was selected as the most appropriate for the bimodal data observed for cells grown in glucose. Masking was defined as more than 50% decrease in MFI based on 6 independent biological replicates of glucose vs. glucose-lactate grown cells. Plots are representative of at least two biological replicates for strains with no masking defect and at least three biological replicates for strains with an observed masking defect.

Spent culture media

J774.1 macrophages (ECACC, HPA, Salisbury, UK) were resuspended from liquid nitrogen stocks and grown to confluency in RPMI-1640 + L-glutamine + 10% FCS-HI + 100 U/mL Penicillin + 100 μg/ml Streptomycin. Cells were split and incubated for 3 days in fresh medium. The supernatant was collected and passed through a 0.45 μm filter. C. albicans SC5314 was pre-grown in YNB plus 2% glucose, washed with 1xPBS, and incubated in fresh medium or spent, filtered supernatant for 6 hours. Cells were stained for β-glucan as described above.

L. reuteri isolated from pig gut was a generous gift from Dr Karen Scott (Rowett Institute of Nutrition and Health, University of Aberdeen). L. reuteri was incubated overnight in M2 medium (Sigma) at 37 °C, ambient air, 200 rpm. Cells were spun down and the supernatant was collected and passed through a 0.45 μm filter. C. albicans SC5314 was pre-grown in YNB plus 2% glucose, washed with 1xPBS, and incubated in fresh M2 or spent, filtered supernatant for 6 hours. Cells were stained for β-glucan as described above and 10,000 cells were analyzed by Flow Cytometry; n=2.

Plasmid construction

GFP-tagged proteins were generated by cloning the relevant ORF into CIp-NAT-GFP, which uses the CIp-NAT backbone 48 with the GFP ORF flanked by Age1 and Kas1 restriction sites to facilitate in-frame cloning under control of the ACT1 promoter. The GPR1 ORF was inserted at the Age1 restriction site to generate GPR1-GFP. The CRZ1 ORF was inserted in-frame at the Kas1 restriction site to generate GFP-CRZ1.

RNA extraction and analysis

Cells were incubated overnight in 5 ml volumes in the indicated conditions and transferred to fresh medium in 50 mL culture flasks for 4 h (30 °C, 200 rpm) to an OD600 = 0.6. RNA was obtained via Qiazol/chloroform extraction (QIAgen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and assessed for quality by NanoDrop 1000 (Thermo Scientific). RNA was DNAse treated (TURBO DNAse, Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and assessed for quality by Agilent Bioanalyser (RIN>8). Samples were processed through the Ion Torrent Proton sequencer (CGEBM University of Aberdeen Genomics facility). Raw fastq files were successively processed in the following order through Fastqc (v. 10.1), Trimgalore (v. 3.1), Samtools (v. 1.19), STAR aligner (v. 2.4) and Htseq (v. 5.4). Genome alignment was conducted against the C_albicans_SC5314_version_A21-s02-m09-r08 chromosomes file provided by the Candida Genome Database (http://www.candidagenome.org/)49. Aligned data were quality controlled via the Partek Genomics Suite® software, version 6.6, Copyright 2015, as per manufacturer’s instructions. Biological replicates grouped by genotype and growth medium, and exhibited similar variance within each condition. Gene expression analysis was performed using Partek® Genomics Suite® software using a log2 data transformation as the Partek® recommended default. GO term analysis was performed in parallel through the Candida Genome Database GO Term Finder and the Cytoscape v. 3 Clue GO plugin50. Network construction was performed with Cytoscape V.3 freeware51. Statistical comparison among GO term enrichment percentages was performed with Graph Pad Prism (v. 6) using Student’s T-test for two-tailed data. Data represent three independent biological replicates for each condition.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Tables

Acknowledgements

All correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Alistair Brown. We apologize to colleagues whose work we have been unable to cite because of space constraints. We thank Frank Odds for access to his collection of clinical isolates. We are grateful to Raif Yuecel and Linda Duncan in the Iain Fraser Cytometry Centre (Aberdeen University), and Ms Lucinda Wight and Mr Kevin MacKenzie in the Microscopy and Histology Core Facility (Aberdeen University) for their expert help with the cytometry and microscopy experiments. We are also grateful for the assistance of staff at the University of Aberdeen Medical Research Facility. We also thank Mr Brennan Martin in the Centre for Genome Enabled Biology and Medicine (Aberdeen University) for help with the RNA sequencing.

Funding:

AJPB: This work was supported by the European Research Council (STRIFE, ERC-2009-AdG-249793), The UK Medical Research Council (MR/M026663/1), the UK Biotechnology and Biological Research Council (BB/K017365/1), the Wellcome Trust (080088; 097377). ERB: This work was supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Research Council (BB/M014525/1). GMA: Supported by the CNPq-Brazil (Science without Borders fellowship 202976/2014-9). GDB: Wellcome Trust (102705). CAM: This work was supported by the UK Medical Research Council (G0400284). DMM: This work was supported by UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC/K000306/1). NARG/JW: Wellcome Trust (086827, 075470,101873) and Wellcome Trust Strategic Award in Medical Mycology and Fungal Immunology (097377). ALL: This work was supported by the MRC Centre for Medical Mycology and the University of Aberdeen (MR/N006364/1).

Footnotes

Author contributions

E.R.B., D.S.C., G.M.A. and A.J.P.B. planned the experiments. E.R.B., G.M.A., D.S.C., J.M., J.M.B., J.W., M.D.P. and D.M.M. performed the experiments. S.L.K. and E.R.B performed bioinformatic analyses. S.E.H, L.A.W., L.P.E., C.A.M, N.A.R.G. and G.D.B. provided materials and valuable insight during this study. E.R.B. and A.J.P.B. drafted the manuscript with contributions from J.M., G.M.A., D.S.C., J.M.B., C.A.M, N.A.R.G., G.D.B. and D.M.M.

Data availability. The RNA sequencing dataset is available at EBI (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) under accession number E-MTAB-4579. Other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Brown GD, Gordon S. Immune recognition. A new receptor for beta-glucans. Nature. 2001;413:36–37. doi: 10.1038/35092620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hardison SE, Brown GD. C-type lectin receptors orchestrate antifungal immunity. Nature immunology. 2012;13:817–822. doi: 10.1038/ni.2369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.O'Meara TR, Alspaugh JA. The Cryptococcus neoformans capsule: a sword and a shield. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:387–408. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00001-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carrion SdJ, et al. The RodA hydrophobin on Aspergillus fumigatus spores masks dectin-1- and dectin-2-dependent responses and enhances fungal survival in vivo. Journal of Immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2013;191:2581–2588. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gow NAR, Hube B. Importance of the Candida albicans cell wall during commensalism and infection. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2012;15:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wheeler RT, Fink GR. A drug-sensitive genetic network masks fungi from the immune system. PLoS Pathogens. 2006;2:e35. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wheeler RT, Kombe D, Agarwala SD, Fink GR. Dynamic, morphotype-specific Candida albicans beta-glucan exposure during infection and drug treatment. PLoS Pathogens. 2008;4:e1000227. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nett JE, Sanchez H, Cain MT, Andes DR. Genetic basis of Candida biofilm resistance due to drug-sequestering matrix glucan. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;202:171–175. doi: 10.1086/651200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gantner BN, Simmons RM, Underhill DM. Dectin-1 mediates macrophage recognition of Candida albicans yeast but not filaments. Embo J. 2005;24:1277–1286. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hopke A, et al. Neutrophil Attack Triggers Extracellular Trap-Dependent Candida Cell Wall Remodeling and Altered Immune Recognition. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005644. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sosinska GJ, et al. Hypoxic conditions and iron restriction affect the cell-wall proteome of Candida albicans grown under vagina-simulative conditions. Microbiology (Reading, England) 2008;154:510–520. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/012617-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ene IV, et al. Host carbon sources modulate cell wall architecture, drug resistance and virulence in a fungal pathogen. Cellular Microbiology. 2012;14:1319–1335. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01813.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Munro CA, et al. The PKC, HOG and Ca2+ signalling pathways co-ordinately regulate chitin synthesis in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:1399–1413. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05588.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heilmann CJ, et al. Surface stress induces a conserved cell wall stress response in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Eukaryotic Cell. 2013;12:254–264. doi: 10.1128/EC.00278-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Galán-Díez M, et al. Candida albicans beta-glucan exposure is controlled by the fungal CEK1-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway that modulates immune responses triggered through dectin-1. Infect Immun. 2010;78:1426–1436. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00989-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ene IV, Cheng S-C, Netea MG, Brown AJP. Growth of Candida albicans Cells on the Physiologically Relevant Carbon Source Lactate Affects Their Recognition and Phagocytosis by Immune Cells. Infect Immun. 2013;81:238–248. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01092-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barelle CJ, et al. Niche-specific regulation of central metabolic pathways in a fungal pathogen. Cellular Microbiology. 2006;8:961–971. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00676.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Owen DH, Katz DF. A vaginal fluid simulant. Contraception. 1999;59:91–95. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00010-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ene IV, et al. Cell Wall Remodeling Enzymes Modulate Fungal Cell Wall Elasticity and Osmotic Stress Resistance. mBio. 2015;6:e00986. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00986-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Marakalala MJ, et al. Differential adaptation of Candida albicans in vivo modulates immune recognition by dectin-1. PLoS Pathogens. 2013;9:e1003315. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vieira N, et al. Functional specialization and differential regulation of short-chain carboxylic acid transporters in the pathogen Candida albicans. Molecular Microbiology. 2010;75:1337–1354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07003.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kuei C, et al. Study of GPR81, the Lactate Receptor, from Distant Species Identifies Residues and Motifs Critical for GPR81 Functions. Molecular Pharmacology. 2011;80:848–858. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.074500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Maidan MM, et al. The G protein-coupled receptor Gpr1 and the Galpha protein Gpa2 act through the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway to induce morphogenesis in Candida albicans. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1971–1986. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E04-09-0780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lemaire K, Van de Velde S, Van Dijck P, Thevelein JM. Glucose and sucrose act as agonist and mannose as antagonist ligands of the G protein-coupled receptor Gpr1 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular Cell. 2004;16:293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Johnston CA, Siderovski DP. Receptor-Mediated Activation of Heterotrimeric G-Proteins: Current Structural Insights. Molecular Pharmacology. 2007;72:219–230. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.034348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Leberer E, et al. Virulence and hyphal formation of Candida albicans require the Ste20p-like protein kinase CaCla4p. Current biology: CB. 1997;7:539–546. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00252-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Santos M, de Larrinoa IF. Functional characterization of the Candida albicans CRZ1 gene encoding a calcineurin-regulated transcription factor. Curr Genet. 2005;48:88–100. doi: 10.1007/s00294-005-0003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karababa M, et al. CRZ1, a target of the calcineurin pathway in Candida albicans. Molecular Microbiology. 2006;59:1429–1451. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05037.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kelly MT, et al. The Candida albicans CaACE2 gene affects morphogenesis, adherence and virulence. Mol Microbiol. 2004;53:969–983. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Desai PR, van Wijlick L, Kurtz D, Juchimiuk M, Ernst JF. Hypoxia and Temperature Regulated Morphogenesis in Candida albicans. PLoS Genetics. 2015;11:e1005447–1005431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hall RA, et al. The Mnn2 mannosyltransferase family modulates mannoprotein fibril length, immune recognition and virulence of Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003276. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bain JM, et al. Candida albicans hypha formation and mannan masking of β-glucan inhibit macrophage phagosome maturation. mBio. 2014;5:e01874. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01874-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Flint HJ, Scott KP, Louis P, Duncan SH. The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health. Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology. 2012;9:577–589. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jacobs I. Blood lactate. Implications for training and sports performance. Sports Med. 1986;3:10–25. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198603010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Netea MG, et al. Immune sensing of Candida albicans requires cooperative recognition of mannans and glucans by lectin and Toll-like receptors. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1642–1650. doi: 10.1172/JCI27114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ferwerda B, et al. Human dectin-1 deficiency and mucocutaneous fungal infections. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1760–1767. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Iliev ID, et al. Interactions between commensal fungi and the C-type lectin receptor Dectin-1 influence colitis. Science. 2012;336:1314–1317. doi: 10.1126/science.1221789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wheeler RT, Kupiec M, Magnelli P, Abeijon C, Fink GR. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant with increased virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:2766–2770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0437995100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chen YL, et al. Convergent Evolution of Calcineurin Pathway Roles in Thermotolerance and Virulence in Candida glabrata. G3 (Bethesda) 2012;2:675–691. doi: 10.1534/g3.112.002279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lev S, Desmarini D, Chayakulkeeree M, Sorrell TC, Djordjevic JT. The Crz1/Sp1 transcription factor of Cryptococcus neoformans is activated by calcineurin and regulates cell wall integrity. PLoS One. 2012;7:e51403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ene IV, et al. Carbon source-induced reprogramming of the cell wall proteome and secretome modulates the adherence and drug resistance of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Proteomics. 2012;12:3164–3179. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Gravelat FN, et al. Aspergillus galactosaminogalactan mediates adherence to host constituents and conceals hyphal beta-glucan from the immune system. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003575. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rappleye CA, Goldman WE. Fungal stealth technology. Trends Immunol. 2008;29:18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2007.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Noble SM, Johnson AD. Strains and strategies for large-scale gene deletion studies of the diploid human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4:298–309. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.2.298-309.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lewis LE, et al. Stage specific assessment of Candida albicans phagocytosis by macrophages identifies cell wall composition and morphogenesis as key determinants. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002578. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Netea MG, et al. Increased susceptibility of TNF-alpha lymphotoxin-alpha double knockout mice to systemic candidiasis through impaired recruitment of neutrophils and phagocytosis of Candida albicans. J Immunol. 1999;163:1498–1505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Graham LM, et al. Soluble Dectin-1 as a tool to detect beta-glucans. J Immunol Methods. 2006;314:164–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shahana S, et al. New Clox Systems for rapid and efficient gene disruption in Candida albicans. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e100390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Inglis DO, et al. The Candida Genome Database incorporates multiple Candida species: multispecies search and analysis tools with curated gene and protein information for Candida albicans and Candida glabrata. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D667–674. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bindea G, et al. ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1091–1093. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shannon P, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13:2498–2504. doi: 10.1101/gr.1239303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures
Supplementary Tables

RESOURCES