Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Nov;10(11):e006007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.006007

Table 4.

Upper and Lower Range of Errors in 2 Hypothetical Clinical Scenarios (Interobserver-Acquisition Comparison 2)

Patient With Normal Echocardiographic Indices (2-Year Old, BSA 0.73)
Normal Values* %difference Lower Range of Error Upper Range of Error
EDD (M-mode), cm 3.5 5.5 3.3 3.7
SF (M-mode), % 37 18.4 30.2 43.8
SF (2D), % 37 19.2 29.9 44.1
Mass (M-mode), gm 51.2 16.7 42.6 59.7
FAC (4-C), % 50 19.2 40.4 59.6
EDV (5/6 AL), cc 48 9.2 43.6 52.4
EF (5/6 AL), % 65 11.3 57.7 72.3
Mass (5/6 AL), gm 40 12.3 35.1 44.9
Patient with Abnormal Echocardiographic Indices (2-year old, BSA 0.73)
Abnormal values %difference Lower range of error Upper range of error
EDD (M-mode), cm 4.8 5.5 4.6 5.1
SF (M-mode), % 23 18.4 18.8 27.2
SF (2D), % 23 19.2 18.6 27.4
Mass (M-mode), gm 153.5 16.7 127.8 179.1
FAC (4-C), % 20 19.2 16.2 23.8
EDV (5/6 AL), cc 90 9.2 81.7 98.3
EF (5/6 AL), % 36 11.3 31.9 40.1
Mass (5/6 AL), gm 95 12.3 83.3 106.7

2D indicates 2 dimensional; 4-C, 4 chamber; 5/6 AL, 5/6 area-length method; BSA, body surface area; EDD, end-diastolic dimension; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; FAC, fractional area change; and SF, shortening fraction.

*

Z score close to 0.

Z score of +5 or −5.