Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 13.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017 Jul 13;3(9):2098–2109. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00185

Table 3.

Impact of pH on SG-CViL Silica Sol Particle Size Dynamics

pH Particle size distribution Initial particle sizea Final particle size Particle growth rate (nm/min)b Particle size increase (%)
6.4 bimodal (42 min)c 94.8 ± 11.0 (15 min) 143.3 ± 1.88 (66 min)
1,225.3 ± 180.2 (66 min)
6.01 (15–42)
24.95 (42–66)
−3.89 (42–66)d
1,292
7.4 monomodal 59.3 ± 3.44 (6 min) 255.7 ± 78.2 (90 min) 2.03 431
8.4 monomodal 59.4 ± 8.56 (12 min) 156.2 ± 23.3 (90 min) 1.29 262
9.8 monomodal 48.4 ± 2.41 (39 min) 68.1 ± 2.24 (90 min) 0.42 142
a

Numbers in parenthesis indicate aging time when particles become measurable using DLS.

b

Best fit lines and R2-values reported in the Supporting Information (Figure S1).

c

Aging time when PSD becomes bimodal

d

The numbers in parenthesis indicate the aging time interval (in min.) for which the particle growth rate is calculated. The first growth rate is associated with the particle population before transition to a bimodal distribution. The second growth rate is associated with the large particle population of the bimodal particle distribution and the third (negative) growth rate is associated with the small particle population. See Figure S1 for explanation of negative growth curve