Table 3. Proportion of top 17% priority areas that are directly threatened by each of the threats.
Intensity is used qualitatively to explore how the assumed impact on the natural system is distributed within the broader threat classification.
| Threat | Top 17% Priority Area | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Residential | Agriculture | Forest Loss | 3 Priority Area Overlap | |
| Agriculture | ||||
| High Intensity | 11.35% | 10.75% | 9.78% | 10.94% |
| Mid Intensity | 4.38% | 4.00% | 4.30% | 4.64% |
| Low Intensity | 6.59% | 6.51% | 7.59% | 8.63% |
| Total | 22.32% | 21.26% | 21.67% | 24.21% |
| Residential | ||||
| Urban | 0.68% | 0.60% | 0.58% | 0.60% |
| Peri-urban | 3.40% | 3.06% | 3.11% | 3.61% |
| Total | 4.08% | 3.66% | 3.69% | 4.21% |
| Forest Loss | ||||
| High Loss | 18.98% | 18.63% | 21.80% | 25.00% |
| Mid Loss | 12.85% | 12.62% | 15.01% | 16.92% |
| Low Loss | 8.67% | 8.40% | 9.83% | 10.66% |
| Total | 31.82% | 31.25% | 36.82% | 41.91% |
| Total from all threats combined | 44.31% | 43.02% | 46.59% | 52.14% |