Table 4. Proportion of global conservation schemes that fall within the top 17% Zonation priority area and are directly threatened by at least one of agriculture, residential and commercial development, or forest loss.

Numbers in parentheses show the total proportion of the area threatened in each scheme. Intensity is used qualitatively to explore how the assumed impact on the natural system is distributed within the broader threat classification.

	CI Hotspots	Wilderness	PA (all)	KBA
Agriculture
High Intensity	6.20% (12.30%)	0.18% (0.47%)	1.24% (2.43%)	3.28% (6.87%)
Mid Intensity	2.10% (3.39%)	0.08% (0.36%)	0.55% (1.51%)	1.28% (2.77%)
Low Intensity	4.43% (6.77%)	0.20% (0.73%)	0.95% (2.08%)	1.82% (3.25%)
Total	12.73% (22.47%)	0.46% (1.56%)	2.74% (6.03%)	6.39% (12.89%)
Residential
Urban	0.26% (0.46%)	0.00% (0.06%)	0.06% (0.11%)	0.09% (0.22%)
Peri-urban	2.06% (3.78%)	0.02% (0.01%)	0.38% (0.74%)	0.67% (1.65%)
Total	2.32% (4.24%)	0.03% (0.05%)	0.44% (0.85%)	0.77% (1.87%)
Forest Loss
High Loss	12.43% (18.14%)	1.10% (4.38%)	2.87% (6.54%)	5.36% (8.71%)
Mid Loss	8.71% (12.43%)	0.50% (1.81%)	1.86% (4.03%)	3.44% (5.66%)
Low Loss	5.62% (8.63%)	0.36% (1.60%)	1.54% (3.52%)	2.89% (5.02%)
Total	21.14% (30.58%)	1.60% (6.20%)	4.73% (10.57%)	8.80% (14.37%)
Total from all threats combined	34.49% (43.98%)	2.66% (7.25%)	9.68% (14.52%)	18.15% (23.96%)