Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;71(11):1287–1295. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1242

Table 2.

Summary of Analyses for Secondary Outcomes

Measure and Treatment Arm Before Treatment After Treatment Estimated Difference Between Arms After Treatmenta P Value
No. of Participants Observed Score, Mean (95% CI) No. of Participants Observed Score, Mean (95% CI)
ICG
 CGT 74 46.1 (44.0–48.2) 64 22.8 (19.5–26.0) −5.52 .01
 IPT 77 46.0 (43.8–48.2) 66 28.0 (25.2–30.9)
WSAS
 CGT 68 22.3 (19.7–24.9) 63 10.7 (8.3–13.1)   −4.44   .006
 IPT 72 21.8 (19.5–24.2) 66 14.0 (11.5–16.5)
GRAQ
 CGT 63 23.9 (20.7–27.1) 62 15.9 (12.8–19.0) −4.04 .09
 IPT 68 23.9 (20.5–27.3) 62 18.5 (15.3–21.8)
BDI
 CGT 62 22.4 (19.9–24.8) 62 13.5 (11.2–15.9) −2.14 .18
 IPT 71 20.5 (18.5–22.4) 65 14.0 (12.0–16.1)

Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; CGT, complicated grief treatment; GRAQ, Grief-Related Avoidance Questionnaire; ICG, Inventory of Complicated Grief; IPT, interpersonal psychotherapy; WSAS, Work and Social Adjustment Scale.

a

Estimated difference between CGT and IPT at week 20 was obtained using a linear mixed-effects model based on longitudinal measurements of each secondary outcome.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure