Table 2.
Summary of Analyses for Secondary Outcomes
Measure and Treatment Arm | Before Treatment | After Treatment | Estimated Difference Between Arms After Treatmenta | P Value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of Participants | Observed Score, Mean (95% CI) | No. of Participants | Observed Score, Mean (95% CI) | |||
ICG | ||||||
CGT | 74 | 46.1 (44.0–48.2) | 64 | 22.8 (19.5–26.0) | −5.52 | .01 |
IPT | 77 | 46.0 (43.8–48.2) | 66 | 28.0 (25.2–30.9) | ||
WSAS | ||||||
CGT | 68 | 22.3 (19.7–24.9) | 63 | 10.7 (8.3–13.1) | −4.44 | .006 |
IPT | 72 | 21.8 (19.5–24.2) | 66 | 14.0 (11.5–16.5) | ||
GRAQ | ||||||
CGT | 63 | 23.9 (20.7–27.1) | 62 | 15.9 (12.8–19.0) | −4.04 | .09 |
IPT | 68 | 23.9 (20.5–27.3) | 62 | 18.5 (15.3–21.8) | ||
BDI | ||||||
CGT | 62 | 22.4 (19.9–24.8) | 62 | 13.5 (11.2–15.9) | −2.14 | .18 |
IPT | 71 | 20.5 (18.5–22.4) | 65 | 14.0 (12.0–16.1) |
Abbreviations: BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; CGT, complicated grief treatment; GRAQ, Grief-Related Avoidance Questionnaire; ICG, Inventory of Complicated Grief; IPT, interpersonal psychotherapy; WSAS, Work and Social Adjustment Scale.
Estimated difference between CGT and IPT at week 20 was obtained using a linear mixed-effects model based on longitudinal measurements of each secondary outcome.