Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Phys Chem B. 2015 Dec 17;120(8):1894–1910. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09656

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cu(I)/Cu(II)-water gas phase models studied to compare different computational methods. (a) [Cu(II)(H2O)6]2+; (b) [Cu(II)(H2O)5]2+ (c) [Cu(I)(H2O)4]+. See Table 2 for optimized values of distances and angles; see Supporting Information for additional results, including the relative stability of the two types of [Cu(I)(H2O)4]+ configurations in (c).