Table 2.
Methodb | rCuO | rCuO′ | rCuO″ | rCuO‴ | ∠OCuO′ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
[Cu(II)(H2O)5]2+ | |||||
B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ | 1.98 | 2.02 | 2.19 | ||
B97-1/aug-cc-pVTZ | 1.98 | 2.02 | 2.20 | ||
B3LYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 1.99 | 2.04 | 2.16 | ||
BLYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 2.04 | 2.05 | 2.26 | ||
DFTB3 | 2.01 | 2.04 | 2.22 | ||
| |||||
[Cu(II)(H2O)6]2+ | |||||
B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ | 2.02 | 2.31 | – | – | 90.0/180.0 |
B97-1/aug-cc-pVTZ | 2.02 | 2.31 | – | – | 90.0/180.0 |
B3LYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 2.03 | 2.25 | – | – | 90.0/180.0 |
BLYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 2.05 | 2.28 | – | – | 90.0/180.0 |
DFTB3 | 2.03 | 2.34 | – | – | 90.0/180.0 |
| |||||
[Cu(I)(H2O)2]+ | |||||
B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ | 1.91 | – | – | – | 180.0 |
B97-1/aug-cc-pVTZ | 1.92 | – | – | – | 180.0 |
B3LYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 1.92 | – | – | – | 180.0 |
BLYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 1.92 | – | – | – | 180.0 |
DFTB3 | 1.89 | – | – | – | 180.0 |
CCSD(T) | 1.90 | – | – | – | 180.0 |
| |||||
[Cu(I)(H2O)4]+c | |||||
B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ | 2.04 | 2.11 | 2.20 | 2.23 | 135.2 |
B97-1/aug-cc-pVTZ | 2.04 | 2.11 | 2.22 | 2.26 | 138.8 |
B3LYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 2.03 | 2.12 | 2.17 | 2.23 | 135.4 |
BLYP/Lanl2dz/6-31G(d) | 2.01 | 2.05 | 2.31 | 2.31 | 153.1 |
DFTB3 | 1.92 | 1.91 | 2.43 | 2.51 | 173.5 |
Optimized at the respective levels; distances in Å, angles in degrees. Also see Fig. 4 for the labels of relevant distances and angles.
For results with additional basis sets, see Supporting Information.
Results included here are for the tetrahedron structure; for discussion of the alternative two-coordinated structure (see Fig. 4c), see Supporting Information.