Table 2.
Comparison of radius and tibia trabecular bone microarchitectural outcomes in normal-weight versus obese late-adolescent females
| Normal-weight (n = 12) | Obese (n = 12) | Pa | % diff.b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radius (distal metaphysis) | ||||
| appBV/TV | 0.409 ± 0.014 | 0.388 ± 0.015 | 0.002 | −5.3 |
| appTb.N (1/mm) | 1.551 ± 0.064 | 1.551 ± 0.033 | 0.983 | 0.0 |
| appTb.Th (mm) | 0.264 ± 0.017 | 0.250 ± 0.012 | 0.030 | −5.4 |
| appTb.Sp (mm) | 0.382 ± 0.013 | 0.395 ± 0.012 | 0.016 | 3.3 |
| Tibia (proximal metaphysis) | ||||
| appBV/TV | 0.368 ± 0.022 | 0.358 ± 0.018 | 0.212 | −2.8 |
| appTb.N (1/mm) | 1.601 ± 0.040 | 1.627 ± 0.030 | 0.089 | 1.6 |
| appTb.Th (mm) | 0.230 ± 0.011 | 0.220 ± 0.010 | 0.027 | −4.4 |
| appTb.Sp (mm) | 0.396 ± 0.021 | 0.395 ± 0.016 | 0.984 | −0.3 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD
% diff., percent difference; appBV/TV, apparent bone volume-to-total volume ratio; appTb.N, apparent trabecular number; appTb.Th, apparent trabecular thickness; appTb.Sp, apparent trabecular separation
Test of between-group significance based on independent samples t test
% diff. = [NW – OB/(NW + OB)/2 × 100]