Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2017 Jul 14;101(5):479–488. doi: 10.1007/s00223-017-0303-2

Table 2.

Comparison of radius and tibia trabecular bone microarchitectural outcomes in normal-weight versus obese late-adolescent females

Normal-weight (n = 12) Obese (n = 12) Pa % diff.b
Radius (distal metaphysis)
 appBV/TV 0.409 ± 0.014 0.388 ± 0.015 0.002 −5.3
 appTb.N (1/mm) 1.551 ± 0.064 1.551 ± 0.033 0.983 0.0
 appTb.Th (mm) 0.264 ± 0.017 0.250 ± 0.012 0.030 −5.4
 appTb.Sp (mm) 0.382 ± 0.013 0.395 ± 0.012 0.016 3.3
Tibia (proximal metaphysis)
 appBV/TV 0.368 ± 0.022 0.358 ± 0.018 0.212 −2.8
 appTb.N (1/mm) 1.601 ± 0.040 1.627 ± 0.030 0.089 1.6
 appTb.Th (mm) 0.230 ± 0.011 0.220 ± 0.010 0.027 −4.4
 appTb.Sp (mm) 0.396 ± 0.021 0.395 ± 0.016 0.984 −0.3

Values are presented as mean ± SD

% diff., percent difference; appBV/TV, apparent bone volume-to-total volume ratio; appTb.N, apparent trabecular number; appTb.Th, apparent trabecular thickness; appTb.Sp, apparent trabecular separation

a

Test of between-group significance based on independent samples t test

b

% diff. = [NW – OB/(NW + OB)/2 × 100]