Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 10;9(4):439–457. doi: 10.4055/cios.2017.9.4.439

Table 3. Summary Results* of Noninferiority and Superiority Tests on Change in WOMAC Index from Baseline to Weeks 3 and 6 as Primary and Secondary Endpoints in ITT Population: Observed Cases.

Variable Week 3 Week 6
Placebo (n = 67) Polmacoxib 2 mg (n = 135) Celecoxib 200 mg (n = 134) Placebo (n = 66) Polmacoxib 2 mg (n = 126) Celecoxib 200 mg (n = 132)
WOMAC-pain
 LS mean change −2.2 ± 0.90
(−3.9 to −0.4)
−5.3 ± 0.74
(−6.7 to −3.8)
−4.8 ± 0.74
(−6.2 to −3.3)
−2.7 ± 1.02
(−4.7 to −0.7)
−6.0 ± 0.84
(−7.6 to −4.3)
−6.3 ± 0.83
(−7.9 to −4.7)
 Comparisons vs. placebo −3.1 ± 0.90
(−4.9 to −1.3)
−2.6 ± 0.90
(−4.4 to −0.9)
−3.2 ± 1.03
(−5.3 to −1.2)
−3.6 ± 1.02
(−5.6 to −1.6)
  p-value 0.001 0.004 0.002 0.001
 Polmacoxib vs. celecoxib −0.5 ± 0.73
(−1.9 to 0.9)
0.4 ± 0.85
(−1.3 to 2.0)
  p-value 0.501 0.669
 Noninferiority (NI margin = 5) Yes, UCI (0.9) is less than NI margin (5) Yes, UCI (2.0) is less than NI margin (5)
WOMAC-stiffness
 LS mean change −0.3 ± 0.34
(−1.0 to 0.4)
−1.9 ± 0.26
(−2.4 to −1.3)
−1.4 ± 0.26
(−1.9 to −0.8)
−0.5 ± 0.45
(−1.4 to 0.4)
−1.9 ± 0.38
(−2.7 to −1.2)
−1.9 ± 0.37
(−2.6 to −1.2)
 Comparisons vs. placebo −1.6 ± 0.37
(−2.3 to −0.8)
−1.0 ± 0.37
(−1.8 to −0.3)
−1.5 ± 0.46
(−2.4 to −0.6)
−1.4 ± 0.45
(−2.3 to −0.5)
  p-value < 0.001 0.005 0.002 0.002
 Polmacoxib vs. celecoxib −0.5 ± 0.30
(−1.1 to 0.1)
−0.0 ± 0.37
(−0.8 to 0.7)
  p-value 0.094 0.941
 Noninferiority (NI margin = 2) Yes, UCI (0.1) is less than NI margin (2) Yes, UCI (0.7) is less than NI margin (2)
WOMAC-physical function
 LS mean change −6.1 ± 2.67
(−11.3 to −0.8)
−14.9 ± 2.11
(−19.0 to −10.7)
−11.6 ± 2.11
(−15.7 to −7.4)
−8.4 ± 3.17
(−14.6 to −2.1)
−16.7 ± 2.59
(−21.8 to −11.6)
−16.2 ± 2.56
(−21.3 to −11.2)
 Comparisons vs. placebo −8.8 ± 2.85
(−14.4 to −3.2)
−5.5 ± 2.85
(−11.1 to 0.1)
−8.3 ± 3.29
(−14.8 to −1.9)
−7.9 ± 3.26
(−14.3 to −1.5)
  p-value 0.002 0.055 0.012 0.016
 Polmacoxib vs. celecoxib −3.3 ± 2.32
(−7.8 to 1.3)
−0.4 ± 2.70
(−5.8 to 4.9)
  p-value 0.16 0.868
 Noninferiority (NI margin = 17) Yes, UCI (1.3) is less than NI margin (17) Yes, UCI (4.9) is less than NI margin (17)
WOMAC-OA index
 LS mean change −8.5 ± 3.75
(−15.9 to −1.1)
−22.1 ± 2.99
(−28.0 to −16.2)
−17.8 ± 2.99
(−23.7 to −11.9)
−11.5 ± 4.46
(−20.3 to −2.7)
−24.7 ± 3.66
(−31.9 to −17.5)
−24.5 ± 3.61
(−31.6 to −17.4)
 Comparisons vs. placebo −13.6 ± 3.94
(−21.3 to −5.8)
−9.3 ± 3.94
(−17.0 to −1.5)
−13.2 ± 4.59
(−22.2 to −4.2)
−13.0 ± 4.55
(−22.0 to −4.1)
  p-value 0.001 0.019 0.004 0.004
 Polmacoxib vs. celecoxib −4.3 ± 3.21
(−10.6 to 2.0)
−0.2 ± 3.76
(−7.5 to 7.2)
  p-value 0.183 0.967
 Noninferiority (NI margin = 24) Yes, UCI (2.0) is less than NI margin (24) Yes, UCI (7.2) is less than NI margin (24)

Values are presented as mean ± standard error (95% confidence interval).

WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities, ITT: intent-to-treat, LS: least square, NI: noninferiority, UCI: upper confidence interval, OA: osteoarthritis.

*Data obtained from a mixed-effects analysis of covariance model with fixed effects for treatment group and baseline pain score and a random effect for pooled site.