Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 29.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 Oct 24;20(14):1533–1542. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1383401

Table 3.

Table showing the average ± standard deviation in each ROI among the three groups according to the location of highest stress.

Principal
tensile stress
(MPa)*
Maximum
shear stress
(MPa)
Location
No radiation (Control) 2.40 ± 0.82 46.04 ± 10.63 Outer enamel–buccal occlusal
In vivo radiation 2.56 ± 1.27 45.32 ± 10.34
In vitro radiation 2.35 ± 0.83 44.92 ± 10.81
No radiation (Control) 10.75 ± 2.14 58.57 ± 1.60 Middle enamel
In vivo radiation 12.49 ± 2.45 59.33 ± 1.62
In vitro radiation 10.09 ± 1.91 58.27 ± 1.83
No Radiation (Control) 8.44 ± 1.57 57.83 ± 2.07 Inner enamel cervical
In vivo radiation 9.97 ± 1.32 58.18 ± 1.53
In vitro radiation 8.15 ± 0.97 57.81 ± 1.82
No radiation (Control) 7.98 ± 1.46 50.39 ± 1.59 Dentin-enamel junction
In vivo radiation 8.29 ± 1.19 49.24 ± 2.11
In vitro radiation 9.72 ± 2.01 52.66 ± 2.54
*

Observed increases bolded as compared to the no radiation (control) group.; The location of the region of interest where the highest stresses were observed is shown in the last column for each group.